Antitrust

$117M Pork Price-Fixing Class Action Settlement

$117M Pork Price-Fixing Class Action Settlement — Antitrust class action lawsuit

Case Overview

Pork producers, including companies such as Agri Stats, Clemens, Hormel, JBS, Seaboard, Smithfield, Triumph, and Tyson, have agreed to a class action settlement to resolve claims that they colluded to raise and fix the market price of pork products. The settlement covers raw pork bacon or various types of raw pork (fresh or frozen) derived from parts like bellies, loins, shoulder, ribs, or pork chops.

The allegations claim that these producers worked together to artificially inflate the cost of pork products, meaning consumers paid more than they would have in a genuinely competitive market. The lawsuit involves price-fixing allegations and affects consumers in several states, including Arizona, California, Florida, and New York, among others.

Class members can potentially receive a cash payment based on the amount they spent on eligible pork products during the period between June 28, 2014, and June 30, 2018. To participate, individuals must submit a valid claim form by the deadline of October 29, 2026. The final approval hearing is set for December 11, 2026.

Who May Qualify

Consumers who purchased raw pork bacon or one or more types of raw pork (fresh or frozen) made from bellies, loins, shoulder, ribs, or pork chops from the named defendants or co-conspirators between June 28, 2014, and June 30, 2018, in Arizona, California, the District of Columbia, Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Utah, or West Virginia.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is eligible to file a claim in this settlement?

The settlement benefits consumers who bought raw pork bacon or specific types of raw pork (fresh or frozen) made from various body parts, provided the purchases occurred between June 28, 2014, and June 30, 2018, within the listed states.

What is the deadline for submitting a claim?

Class members must submit a valid claim form by October 29, 2026, to be considered for settlement benefits.

What is the case number and where is the lawsuit filed?

The case number is 0:18-cv-01776-JRT-JFD, and it is filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota.

Related Cases

Visa, Mastercard Non-Bank ATM Surcharge Settlement — Antitrust class action lawsuit

Visa, Mastercard Non-Bank ATM Surcharge Settlement

Current
Antitrust
Visa and Mastercard agreed to a combined $167.5 million settlement to resolve allegations that they violated antitrust laws by allowing differential ATM surcharges. This settlement benefits individuals who were charged access fees for cash withdrawals at independent ATMs between October 24, 2007, and August 14, 2026, and were not fully reimbursed by their bank.
$275M Sandoz and Fougera Antitrust Class Action Settlement — Antitrust class action lawsuit

$275M Sandoz and Fougera Antitrust Class Action Settlement

Current
Antitrust
Sandoz and Fougera have agreed to a $275 million settlement to resolve allegations of conspiring to artificially inflate and fix the prices of generic drugs. This settlement benefits consumers and third-party payers who paid for covered drugs between May 1, 2009, and December 31, 2019. To receive benefits, class members must submit a valid claim form by November 9, 2026.
National Association of Realtors (NAR) Commission Antitrust Settlement — Antitrust class action lawsuit

National Association of Realtors (NAR) Commission Antitrust Settlement

Past
Antitrust
A landmark antitrust verdict and $418 million settlement against the National Association of Realtors found that standard commission-sharing rules illegally inflated real estate agent commissions paid by home sellers across the United States.