Product Liability

3M Combat Arms Earplug Products Liability Litigation

3M Combat Arms Earplug Products Liability Litigation — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Case Overview

This historic multidistrict litigation became the largest in American history, involving over 250,000 claims from U.S. military service members and veterans against the 3M Company. The lawsuits center on the dual-ended Combat Arms Earplugs, Version 2 (CAEv2), which were standard issue to service members between 2003 and 2015.

Plaintiffs allege that the earplugs had a design defect: they were too short to be inserted properly into the ear canal and could loosen imperceptibly, allowing damaging sounds from combat and training exercises to bypass the intended protection. The lawsuits claim 3M knew about this defect but failed to warn the military. As a result, thousands of veterans have suffered from hearing loss, tinnitus (ringing in the ears), and loss of balance. The litigation resulted in a multi-billion dollar settlement agreement to resolve the claims.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I sue 3M for hearing loss from defective Combat Arms earplugs?

Yes. If you are a current or former service member who used 3M Combat Arms earplugs and suffered hearing loss or tinnitus, you may have a claim. This is part of the largest MDL (multidistrict litigation) in U.S. history, and you should consult with a lawyer about your eligibility and options.

How much money can I get from the 3M earplug settlement?

Settlement amounts vary based on the severity of your hearing loss, medical evidence, and other factors. Many claimants have received settlements, but the exact amount depends on individual circumstances. A product liability attorney can help you understand what your claim may be worth.

What is the 3M Combat Arms earplug class action about?

Service members claim that 3M's Combat Arms earplugs were defective and failed to properly block dangerous noise, causing hearing loss and tinnitus. 3M has faced thousands of lawsuits alleging the company knew about the defects but did not adequately warn consumers or recall the product.

Related Cases

Ozempic & GLP-1 Drugs Vision Loss (NAION) Class Action — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Ozempic & GLP-1 Drugs Vision Loss (NAION) Class Action

Current
Product Liability
Class action lawsuit alleging that Ozempic, Wegovy, and other GLP-1 weight loss drugs are linked to NAION (non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy), a serious condition causing sudden vision loss in users.
Depo-Provera (Medroxyprogesterone) Brain Tumor (Meningioma) Mass Tort Litigation — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Depo-Provera (Medroxyprogesterone) Brain Tumor (Meningioma) Mass Tort Litigation

Current
Product Liability
Women who received long-term Depo-Provera (injectable contraceptive) injections are suing Pfizer, alleging the drug significantly increases the risk of developing meningioma brain tumors and that the company failed to warn patients and physicians of this risk despite knowing about it for years.
Tesla Cybertruck Recall & Products Liability Class Action — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Tesla Cybertruck Recall & Products Liability Class Action

Current
Product Liability
Tesla Cybertruck owners filed a class action alleging that the vehicle suffers from dangerous defects — including an accelerator pedal that can get physically trapped and cause unintended full-throttle acceleration — that Tesla knew about before delivery but failed to disclose. The lawsuit follows multiple NHTSA investigations and a major safety recall.