Labor Law

Amazon Discrimination Against Pregnant Workers

Amazon Discrimination Against Pregnant Workers — Labor Law class action lawsuit

Case Overview

A group of former Amazon employees initiated a class action lawsuit against the company, alleging that Amazon discriminated against them by failing to provide necessary work adjustments during pregnancy and by penalizing them for taking medically required breaks.

The plaintiffs contend that Amazon denied basic rights, such as extra breaks, the ability to sit instead of stand, and bathroom breaks, despite requests. Furthermore, they argue that Amazon's requirement of medical paperwork for accommodations is unlawful under the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA), and that the company retaliated by deducting time from unpaid leave or threatening termination when workers took necessary time off for appointments or emergencies.

The lawsuit seeks policy changes from Amazon, along with compensation for past and ongoing violations. The plaintiffs are represented by Debra L. Greenberger and Rachael Wyant of Emery Celli Brinckerhoff Abady Ward & Maazel LLP and Katherine Greenberg of A Better Balance. The case is filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York.

Who May Qualify

Former Amazon employees who were discriminated against by the company while pregnant or who were retaliated against for taking medically necessary breaks.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the basis of the lawsuit?

The lawsuit claims Amazon discriminated against pregnant workers by denying reasonable accommodations, such as extra breaks or the ability to sit, and by retaliating against employees who took necessary time off for medical reasons.

What law do the plaintiffs claim Amazon violated?

The plaintiffs allege that Amazon violated the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA), which mandates that employers provide reasonable accommodations for pregnant workers and prohibits retaliation.

What relief are the plaintiffs seeking?

The plaintiffs are demanding a jury trial, as well as declaratory and injunctive relief, and an award of compensatory, liquidated, and punitive damages for themselves and all class members.

Related Cases

Burlington Alleged Unpaid Wages and Meal Break Violations — Labor Law class action lawsuit

Burlington Alleged Unpaid Wages and Meal Break Violations

Current
Labor Law
A class action lawsuit alleges that Burlington failed to properly compensate hourly retail employees for wages earned during meal breaks and overtime work. The suit claims the company's policies improperly deducted unpaid meal breaks even when employees were not fully relieved of their duties.
Target Unpaid Wages Lawsuit in Colorado — Labor Law class action lawsuit

Target Unpaid Wages Lawsuit in Colorado

Current
Labor Law
A former Target employee initiated a class action lawsuit alleging that the company failed to properly compensate hourly workers in Colorado for all hours worked. The claims specifically focus on unpaid wages, including time missed during meal and rest breaks, and failure to reimburse necessary business expenses.
FedEx Wage and Hour Lawsuits — Labor Law class action lawsuit

FedEx Wage and Hour Lawsuits

Current
Labor Law
Several delivery drivers have filed lawsuits against FedEx alleging unpaid overtime wages. The claims center on whether FedEx improperly structured its business to avoid paying employees for hours worked beyond a standard workweek.