Consumer Fraud

Apple iPhone 'Batterygate' Throttling Consumer Class Action Settlement

Apple iPhone 'Batterygate' Throttling Consumer Class Action Settlement — Consumer Fraud class action lawsuit

Case Overview

Apple Inc. faced a massive consumer fraud class action after the company admitted in December 2017 that it had been deliberately slowing down the performance of older iPhone models—including the iPhone 6, 6S, 7, and SE—through iOS software updates, without informing customers. Apple claimed the throttling was necessary to prevent unexpected shutdowns caused by aging lithium-ion batteries, but plaintiffs alleged the company concealed this practice to conceal battery defects, shorten the perceived useful life of older devices, and drive consumers toward purchasing newer, more expensive iPhone models. The case consolidated over 60 lawsuits filed across the country in a multidistrict litigation proceeding in San Jose, California.

In March 2020, Apple agreed to a settlement of up to $500 million, with individual iPhone owners eligible to receive approximately $25 per device (subject to the total claims filed). The settlement covered U.S. owners of iPhone 6, 6 Plus, 6S, 6S Plus, 7, 7 Plus, and SE models running iOS 10.2.1 or later, or iPhone 7/7 Plus running iOS 11.2 or later, who experienced performance slowdowns. The claims deadline passed in October 2020. The 'Batterygate' scandal drew global regulatory scrutiny—Apple was fined €25 million in France and €10 million in Italy for the same conduct—and prompted Apple to introduce a battery health transparency feature and a discounted battery replacement program in subsequent iOS updates.

Who May Qualify

U.S. residents who owned an iPhone 6, 6 Plus, 6S, 6S Plus, SE (1st gen), 7, or 7 Plus running iOS 10.2.1 or later (or iOS 11.2 or later for iPhone 7/7 Plus) before December 21, 2017. The claims deadline has passed; this case is now closed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Did Apple slow down my iPhone on purpose?

Yes. Apple confirmed in 2017 that it intentionally throttled processor speeds on older iPhone models through iOS updates to prevent unexpected shutdowns linked to degraded batteries. The company argued this protected device functionality, but plaintiffs alleged it was done without disclosure to push consumers toward new iPhones.

How much did Apple pay in the iPhone throttling settlement?

Apple agreed to pay up to $500 million. Eligible claimants received approximately $25 per iPhone. The exact per-device payout varied based on the total number of claims submitted.

Can I still file a claim for the Apple iPhone throttling lawsuit?

No. The claims deadline was October 6, 2020, and has passed. If you did not submit a claim before that date, you are no longer eligible to receive a payment from this settlement.

Related Cases

$30M Equifax Hard Inquiry Dispute Class Action Settlement — Consumer Fraud class action lawsuit

$30M Equifax Hard Inquiry Dispute Class Action Settlement

Current
Consumer Fraud
Equifax agreed to pay $30 million to settle a class action lawsuit concerning its failure to properly investigate consumer disputes regarding hard inquiries on credit reports. The settlement applies to individuals in the United States and its territories who disputed hard inquiries with Equifax during specific timeframes. Class members must submit a valid claim form by November 29, 2026, to receive potential payments.
Aldi Alleged Unequal Pricing for SNAP/EBT Shoppers — Consumer Fraud class action lawsuit

Aldi Alleged Unequal Pricing for SNAP/EBT Shoppers

Current
Consumer Fraud
A class action lawsuit has been filed alleging that Aldi charged higher prices to shoppers using SNAP/EBT benefits and improperly applied these benefits toward fees. The complaint claims this practice constitutes unequal treatment compared to other customers.
Kettle Brand Avocado Oil Chips False Advertising Lawsuit — Consumer Fraud class action lawsuit

Kettle Brand Avocado Oil Chips False Advertising Lawsuit

Current
Consumer Fraud
A consumer has filed a class action lawsuit alleging that Kettle Brand falsely markets its avocado oil chips. The lawsuit claims the chips contain cheaper, refined vegetable oils instead of the advertised avocado oil.