Apple Vision Pro Personal Injury & Distracted Driving Products Liability Litigation
Case Overview
Shortly after Apple's $3,499 Vision Pro spatial computing headset launched in February 2024, a wave of viral videos emerged showing consumers wearing the device while driving vehicles, riding in traffic, and operating other machinery. Plaintiffs in this class action allege that Apple failed to implement adequate safety warnings, technical safeguards, or hardware/software interlocks to prevent use of the headset while in motion, despite knowing the device obstructs normal vision and situational awareness. Multiple accidents and near-misses were reported, and law enforcement agencies in several states issued public safety warnings.
The lawsuit alleges negligent product design, failure to warn, and violations of California consumer protection statutes. Plaintiffs contend that Apple's own marketing—which prominently depicted users engaging with immersive spatial content in various environments—contributed to consumer confusion about safe usage boundaries. The litigation also raises novel legal questions about manufacturer liability for mixed-reality devices that blend digital overlays with real-world environments, a rapidly emerging area of products liability law.
Who May Qualify
Purchasers of the Apple Vision Pro headset who suffered personal injury, property damage, or economic harm related to distracted use of the device, or who were involved in incidents caused by another person using the headset while operating a vehicle or machinery.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I sue Apple if I was injured because someone was wearing a Vision Pro while driving?
Potentially yes. The class action alleges Apple bears liability for failing to build in adequate safety interlocks or warnings to prevent use while driving. If you were injured in such an incident, you may have both individual tort claims and class action claims.
Is the Apple Vision Pro lawsuit still active?
Yes, litigation is ongoing as of 2025. The case is in early proceedings in the Northern District of California, and no settlement has been announced. The court has not yet certified a class.