Consumer Fraud

BarkBox Allegedly Used Fake Insider Deals in Marketing Emails

BarkBox Allegedly Used Fake Insider Deals in Marketing Emails — Consumer Fraud class action lawsuit

Case Overview

The lawsuit was initiated by plaintiff Brylee Davidson against BarkBox Inc. The core allegation is that the company sent marketing emails to residents of Washington state using misleading subject lines regarding the nature and duration of its sales. BarkBox sells monthly subscription boxes containing dog toys, treats, and chews.

Davidson claims that BarkBox routinely sends emails that falsely describe sales as internal or employee discounts, when in reality, these sales are available to the general public on the company's website. Specifically, the complaint points to an email with the subject line “Internal Use Only: Last Day for Employee Discount,” which the plaintiff argues was fake, as the discounts were not exclusively for employees.

The lawsuit seeks to represent anyone who received promotional emails from BarkBox with subject lines advertising supposedly internal or time-limited sales or discounts. The case is currently before the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington, and the plaintiff is seeking class certification, damages, and a jury trial.

Who May Qualify

Anyone who received promotional emails from BarkBox with subject lines advertising supposedly internal or time-limited sales or discounts on BarkBox products.

Frequently Asked Questions

What laws does the lawsuit allege BarkBox violated?

The lawsuit alleges that BarkBox violated Washington’s Commercial Electronic Mail Act and the Consumer Protection Act.

What specific type of misleading email is the lawsuit focused on?

The lawsuit focuses on emails that falsely describe sales as internal or employee discounts, when the plaintiff claims these offers were actually available to the general public.

Who is representing the plaintiff in this lawsuit?

The plaintiff is represented by Cody Hoesly of Barg Singer Hoesly P.C. and Jonas B. Jacobson of Dovel & Luner LLP.

Related Cases

Kroger Class Action Lawsuit Over 'Zero Sugar' Syrup Labeling — Consumer Fraud class action lawsuit

Kroger Class Action Lawsuit Over 'Zero Sugar' Syrup Labeling

Current
Consumer Fraud
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Kroger alleging that the company falsely markets its Simple Truth syrup as 'Zero Sugar.' The plaintiff claims the syrup contains allulose, a sugar, despite the labeling suggesting otherwise.
Google and UPS Package Tracking Data Sharing Lawsuit — Consumer Fraud class action lawsuit

Google and UPS Package Tracking Data Sharing Lawsuit

Current
Consumer Fraud
Two consumers have filed a class action lawsuit alleging that Google and UPS's package tracking system improperly shares users' private data with various third parties. The plaintiffs claim that the system misled users into believing their information was secure when they used the tracking widget on Google Search.
Starbucks COBRA Notice Class Action Settlement — Consumer Fraud class action lawsuit

Starbucks COBRA Notice Class Action Settlement

Current
Consumer Fraud
Starbucks has agreed to a settlement to resolve claims that it did not provide proper Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA) notices to former employees. The settlement benefits former employees who were sent a COBRA notice between July 21, 2016, and January 1, 2023, and did not elect continuation coverage.