Product Liability

Bell & Howell PFAS Cookware Class Action Settlement

Bell & Howell PFAS Cookware Class Action Settlement — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Case Overview

E. Mishan & Sons, the parent company of Gotham Steel, Granite Stone, and Bell & Howell, agreed to a settlement to resolve allegations that it misled consumers by advertising its cookware products as both "healthy" and "non-toxic." The products allegedly contained hazardous chemicals, including but not limited to chromium, iron, nickel, lead, cadmium, PFOA, PFAS, PTFE, and PFOS.

The plaintiffs accused the company of making false claims regarding the safety of its cookware. The settlement requires E. Mishan & Sons to make non-monetary changes, including adding a statement to product labels and its website noting the presence of iron, chromium, and nickel. The lawsuit was filed in the California Superior Court for Riverside County.

The settlement allows eligible class members to receive a cash payment of $6 per qualifying product, up to a maximum of two products per household for a total of $12. To receive benefits, class members must submit a valid claim form by the deadline of September 25, 2026. The final approval hearing is set for November 2, 2026.

Who May Qualify

Consumers who purchased one or more Gotham Steel, Granite Stone, or Bell & Howell brand cookware products (not for resale) in California or Colorado between September 8, 2021, and July 6, 2026.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is eligible for this settlement?

The settlement benefits consumers who bought one or more cookware products from the Gotham Steel, Granite Stone, or Bell & Howell brands. These purchases must have occurred in California or Colorado between September 8, 2021, and July 6, 2026, and the products cannot be for resale.

How much money can I receive?

Class members can receive a cash payment of $6 for each eligible product, with a total limit of $12 per household.

What do I need to file a claim?

To file a claim, you must provide the product model number and/or UPC, the date of purchase, and the retailer where the product was bought.

Related Cases

GM Class Action Over Faulty Brakes in 2025 Models — Product Liability class action lawsuit

GM Class Action Over Faulty Brakes in 2025 Models

Current
Product Liability
A class action lawsuit has been filed against General Motors concerning alleged defects in the brake systems of several 2025 models. The plaintiffs claim that the faulty brakes can lead to a complete or partial loss of braking ability, posing a significant safety risk to drivers.
Jeep Hybrid SUV Misrepresentation Lawsuit — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Jeep Hybrid SUV Misrepresentation Lawsuit

Current
Product Liability
A group of Jeep owners filed a class action lawsuit alleging that FCA misrepresented the safety and reliability of their hybrid SUVs, specifically the Wrangler 4xe and Grand Cherokee 4xe. The lawsuit claims that FCA failed to properly disclose and repair significant defects in these vehicles, despite marketing them as safe and dependable. The plaintiffs allege that their reliance on FCA's representations led them to purchase or lease the vehicles, and they are seeking damages related to these alleged misrepresentations.
Meta Settlement Over Alleged Teen Social Media Harms — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Meta Settlement Over Alleged Teen Social Media Harms

Current
Product Liability
Meta reached a settlement with California and 28 other states regarding allegations of social media's harm to teenagers. The states accused the company of concealing risks to young users while prioritizing profits. The settlement requires Meta to pay billions and implement significant changes to teen account usage.