Consumer Fraud

Bucked Up Protein Drink Mislabeling Class Action

Bucked Up Protein Drink Mislabeling Class Action — Consumer Fraud class action lawsuit

Case Overview

The lawsuit was initiated by Daniel Ruchman against DAS Labs LLC, which operates as Bucked Up. The core allegation is that the company's Lightly Carbonated Protein drinks contain a lower amount of protein than the 25 grams stated on the product labels. Ruchman claims that this inaccurate labeling caused him and other consumers to buy the drinks under the false belief that they were consuming more protein than was actually present.

The complaint asserts that independent laboratory testing allegedly showed the protein content in the drinks to be significantly lower than the advertised 25 grams. Ruchman further alleges that Bucked Up breached an express warranty, engaged in unjust enrichment, and violated several California laws, including the Consumers Legal Remedies Act, Unfair Competition Law, and False Advertising Law. He seeks compensatory damages for himself and all class members.

The plaintiff is seeking a jury trial and requests declaratory and injunctive relief. The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. The content does not provide specific settlement terms, deadlines, or a direct method for affected people to participate, other than noting the plaintiff is represented by Charles C. Weller of Charles C. Weller APC.

,

Who May Qualify

California consumers who purchased Bucked Up Lightly Carbonated Protein drinks within the past four years.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the basis of the lawsuit?

The lawsuit alleges that Bucked Up's Lightly Carbonated Protein drinks are mislabeled, containing less protein than the 25 grams advertised on the label. The plaintiff argues this misrepresentation misled consumers regarding their actual protein intake.

What laws are allegedly violated?

The plaintiff claims that Bucked Up's actions violated several California laws, specifically mentioning the Consumers Legal Remedies Act, Unfair Competition Law, and False Advertising Law, in addition to breaching an express warranty.

Where was the lawsuit filed?

The class action lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.

Related Cases

$17M Kroger Prescription Prices Class Action Settlement — Consumer Fraud class action lawsuit

$17M Kroger Prescription Prices Class Action Settlement

Current
Consumer Fraud
Kroger has agreed to a $17 million settlement to resolve claims regarding the unfair pricing of prescription drugs. The settlement applies to consumers who used their insurance to pay for prescriptions from Kroger between December 9, 2018, and August 23, 2026.
Amazon Tariff Overcharge Class Action Lawsuits — Consumer Fraud class action lawsuit

Amazon Tariff Overcharge Class Action Lawsuits

Current
Consumer Fraud
Consumers have filed multiple class action lawsuits alleging that Amazon improperly charged them for tariffs. The lawsuits claim Amazon raised prices to recover costs associated with tariffs that were later struck down by the Supreme Court.
Equifax FCRA Violations Class Action Settlement — Consumer Fraud class action lawsuit

Equifax FCRA Violations Class Action Settlement

Current
Consumer Fraud
Equifax has agreed to a $100 million settlement to resolve claims regarding the provision of inaccurate credit information to Americans. The lawsuit alleges that Equifax reported data affected by a coding error in its computer system. Affected individuals can submit a claim form by December 28, 2026, to potentially receive between $95 and $280.