Labor Law

Burlington Alleged Unpaid Wages and Meal Break Violations

Burlington Alleged Unpaid Wages and Meal Break Violations — Labor Law class action lawsuit

Case Overview

Three current or former hourly retail employees initiated a collective and class action lawsuit against Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse Corp. The plaintiffs contend that the company systematically underpaid them by automatically deducting unpaid meal breaks, regardless of whether the employees were actually free from work responsibilities. The allegations stem from practices across multiple states, including Texas, California, and New York.

The employees claim that even when working over forty hours weekly, Burlington deducted a thirty-minute unpaid meal break from every shift. Furthermore, they allege that managers required staff to remain available by carrying two-way radios during breaks and responding to work calls, which prevented them from taking a true break. The lawsuit asserts violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act and specific wage laws in California and New York regarding unpaid overtime and meal-period work.

The lawsuit seeks to represent a nationwide group of hourly employees dating back to August 2023, with specific subclasses for California (August 2022) and New York (August 2020). The plaintiffs are demanding a jury trial and are seeking unpaid wages, liquidated damages, penalties, and attorneys' fees. The lawsuit is currently filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey.

Who May Qualify

Hourly retail employees nationwide, with specific subclasses for California and New York, dating to specified dates.

Frequently Asked Questions

What specific violations are alleged against Burlington?

The lawsuit alleges that Burlington failed to pay wages owed for work performed during meal breaks and overtime. Specifically, it claims the company improperly deducted unpaid meal breaks even when employees were not fully relieved of their duties.

What laws are allegedly violated by Burlington?

The employees accuse Burlington of violating the Fair Labor Standards Act, as well as specific wage laws in California and New York, concerning unpaid overtime and meal-period work.

What can affected employees do regarding this lawsuit?

The lawsuit demands a jury trial and seeks unpaid wages, liquidated damages, penalties, and attorneys' fees for the proposed collective and subclasses. The case is filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey.

Related Cases

$14.5M CRST Expedited Minimum Wage Class Action Settlement — Labor Law class action lawsuit

$14.5M CRST Expedited Minimum Wage Class Action Settlement

Past
Labor Law
CRST Expedited agreed to a $14.5 million settlement to resolve allegations that it violated California labor laws concerning minimum wage and other worker compensation issues for its truck drivers.
Festival Foods Manager Overtime Settlement — Labor Law class action lawsuit

Festival Foods Manager Overtime Settlement

Current
Labor Law
Festival Foods has reached a proposed settlement to resolve wage-and-hour claims brought by current and former department managers. The settlement addresses allegations that the company improperly classified these managers as exempt from overtime pay.
Lyft California Employee Misclassification Settlement — Labor Law class action lawsuit

Lyft California Employee Misclassification Settlement

Current
Labor Law
Lyft has agreed to pay $272.5 million to settle claims in California regarding the misclassification of its drivers. The lawsuit alleges that the company improperly categorized its drivers as independent contractors rather than employees, thereby denying them certain wages and protections.