Butterball and Hormel Turkey Price-Fixing Settlements
Case Overview
The litigation involved allegations that major turkey producers, including Butterball, Hormel, and Jennie-O, engaged in an illegal conspiracy. Plaintiffs alleged that these companies shared sensitive business information through a third party named Agri Stats Inc., which was used to limit the supply of turkey and artificially fix prices during specific periods.
The claims centered on antitrust violations, specifically alleging that the sharing of competitively sensitive information constituted a per se violation of the Sherman Act. The proposed settlements resolve the direct purchasers' claims against these defendants, though other claims brought by indirect purchasers are not necessarily resolved by these agreements.
An Illinois federal judge granted preliminary approval to the settlements, which total a combined recovery of $130.7 million for the direct purchasers. The preliminary approval means the settlements can move forward pending final judicial approval. The source notes that the settlements do not imply any admission of wrongdoing or liability by the defendants.
Who May Qualify
Direct purchasers of turkey products.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does preliminary approval mean for the settlements?
Preliminary approval from the judge means that the settlements are permitted to proceed, but they are still subject to final approval by the court.
Who is covered by these specific settlements?
These agreements specifically resolve the direct purchasers' claims against Butterball, Hormel, and Jennie-O. Other types of claims, such as those from indirect purchasers, are not necessarily covered.
Did the defendants admit to any wrongdoing?
The source explicitly states that the proposed settlements do not indicate that the defendants admitted to any wrongdoing or liability.
Related Cases
McDonald's Alleged Algorithmic Price-Fixing Class Action
Expedia Antitrust Class Action Over Inflated Hotel Prices