Antitrust

Deere & Company (John Deere) Right-to-Repair Antitrust Litigation

Deere & Company (John Deere) Right-to-Repair Antitrust Litigation — Antitrust class action lawsuit

Case Overview

This class action accuses Deere & Company of leveraging its dominant position in the agricultural-equipment market to eliminate competition in the aftermarket repair and parts sector. Plaintiffs — farmers and independent repair technicians — allege that Deere deliberately embedded software controls into its tractors, combines, and planters that prevent owners and non-authorized shops from performing even basic repairs without access to Deere's proprietary "Service ADVISOR" diagnostic software. This software is exclusively licensed to authorized dealers, who charge substantially higher labor rates than independent competitors. The complaint alleges violations of the Sherman Antitrust Act and various state antitrust and consumer protection statutes.

The litigation gained national momentum alongside a broader Right-to-Repair movement. In January 2023, Deere signed a Memorandum of Understanding with the American Farm Bureau Federation pledging to expand owner access to diagnostic tools by 2025 — but critics and plaintiffs argue the MOU is unenforceable and falls well short of true repair freedom. The FTC has separately issued reports criticizing manufacturers' repair restrictions. The case survived a motion to dismiss in 2023 and is currently in the discovery phase, with class certification briefing expected in 2025.

Who May Qualify

U.S. farmers, agricultural businesses, and independent repair shops that own or service John Deere equipment manufactured after approximately 2010 and paid inflated repair costs or were denied the ability to perform repairs due to Deere's software-lock restrictions on diagnostic and repair tools.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can farmers sue John Deere for repair restrictions?

Yes. This ongoing federal antitrust class action allows farmers and independent repair shops harmed by Deere's software-lock repair restrictions to seek damages. The case survived a motion to dismiss and is currently in discovery.

What did John Deere agree to in the 2023 Right-to-Repair deal?

In January 2023, Deere signed a Memorandum of Understanding with the American Farm Bureau promising expanded access to diagnostic tools and software by 2025. However, the lawsuit continues because plaintiffs argue the MOU is non-binding and does not compensate farmers for past overcharges.

How much could farmers recover in the John Deere antitrust lawsuit?

Plaintiffs seek treble damages under the Sherman Act for the premium they paid above competitive repair prices over the class period. No settlement has been reached; the case is in the discovery phase as of mid-2025.

Related Cases

Blue Cross Antitrust Lawsuit Over Alleged Overcharging in Michigan — Antitrust class action lawsuit

Blue Cross Antitrust Lawsuit Over Alleged Overcharging in Michigan

Current
Antitrust
The state of Michigan filed an antitrust lawsuit against Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Mutual Insurance Company, alleging the insurer violated antitrust laws by conspiring with other Blue Cross Blue Shield entities. The suit claims this conspiracy allowed the company to overcharge the state for administering employee medical benefit plans and harmed Michigan residents by limiting choice and quality in healthcare.
Amazon and Apple Class Action Lawsuit Over Inflated iPad Buy Box Prices — Antitrust class action lawsuit

Amazon and Apple Class Action Lawsuit Over Inflated iPad Buy Box Prices

Current
Antitrust
Two consumers initiated a class action lawsuit alleging that Amazon and Apple colluded to remove third-party resellers from Amazon's marketplace, which allegedly resulted in inflated prices for iPads.
$120M NAR Real Estate Commission Class Action Settlement — Antitrust class action lawsuit

$120M NAR Real Estate Commission Class Action Settlement

Current
Antitrust
The National Association of Realtors and several real estate brokerage companies agreed to pay over $120 million to resolve claims regarding violations of federal antitrust laws related to real estate commissions.