Environmental

DuPont, Chemours, Corteva PFAS Settlement with North Carolina

DuPont, Chemours, Corteva PFAS Settlement with North Carolina — Environmental class action lawsuit

Case Overview

DuPont, Chemours, and Corteva agreed to settle claims with the state of North Carolina concerning the contamination of the state's environment with per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), often called "forever chemicals." The settlement was reached after the companies faced allegations regarding the release of these chemicals, including at the Fayetteville Works plant in Bladen County and through the use of aqueous film forming foam found in firefighting foam.

The settlement structure includes a $455 million fund to be distributed over 15 years to the state and 11 local counties, towns, and utilities. Additionally, DuPont and Corteva committed $135 million to a reserve fund to ensure DuPont's ongoing compliance with a 2019 consent order. The settlement resolves disputes that were previously before the North Carolina Supreme Court and the underlying case pending before the North Carolina Business Court.

The settlement announcement did not include any admission of wrongdoing by the companies. For those who may qualify, the content suggests that individuals who have developed cancer or other serious health conditions after exposure to PFAS in drinking water may be able to join a PFAS lawsuit investigation. For the most current information, affected people should consult the settlement administrator or their attorney.

Who May Qualify

Individuals who have developed cancer or another serious health condition after being exposed to PFAS in drinking water.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the total amount of the settlement?

The total settlement reached by DuPont, Chemours, and Corteva with North Carolina is $590 million. This includes a $455 million fund for the state and local entities, plus a $135 million commitment from DuPont and Corteva to a reserve fund.

Did the companies admit to causing the contamination?

The settlement announcement explicitly stated that the companies did not admit to any wrongdoing as part of the agreement with North Carolina.

What types of PFAS contamination are covered?

The claims relate to contamination from the alleged release of PFAS at the Fayetteville Works plant in Bladen County, North Carolina, and from the reported use of aqueous film forming foam in firefighting foam.

Related Cases

3M / Aearo Technologies Earplug PFAS Contamination Water Utility Lawsuit — Environmental class action lawsuit

3M / Aearo Technologies Earplug PFAS Contamination Water Utility Lawsuit

Current
Environmental
Hundreds of water utilities and municipalities across the United States are suing 3M, alleging the company's manufacture and sale of PFAS-containing products (including firefighting foams and consumer goods) contaminated drinking water supplies, forcing utilities to spend billions on testing and remediation.
Styrofoam / Polystyrene Food Container Environmental & Consumer Class Action — Environmental class action lawsuit

Styrofoam / Polystyrene Food Container Environmental & Consumer Class Action

Current
Environmental
Environmental and consumer advocacy groups, along with individual plaintiffs, have filed suit against Dart Container Corporation — the world's largest maker of single-use foam cups and containers — alleging that the company misled consumers about the recyclability of its polystyrene products and is responsible for widespread environmental contamination from foam litter.
NPE/PFAS 'Forever Chemicals' Drinking Water Contamination Litigation — Environmental class action lawsuit

NPE/PFAS 'Forever Chemicals' Drinking Water Contamination Litigation

Current
Environmental
Thousands of public water systems across the U.S. sued 3M, DuPont, and other manufacturers after PFAS 'forever chemicals' contaminated drinking water supplies nationwide. 3M agreed to pay up to $12.5 billion and DuPont-related entities agreed to pay $1.185 billion to resolve claims.