Product Liability

Gerber and Baby Food Makers Autism MDL Partial Summary Judgment

Gerber and Baby Food Makers Autism MDL Partial Summary Judgment — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Case Overview

A federal judge granted partial summary judgment to baby food manufacturers, such as Gerber Products Co., Beech-Nut Nutrition Co., The Hain Celestial Group Inc., and Walmart Inc., in a multidistrict litigation. This ruling addresses claims that heavy metals present in the baby food caused children to develop autism or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).

The lawsuits alleged that the companies knowingly sold baby food contaminated with toxic heavy metals, referencing a 2021 congressional report on this issue. The claims involved allegations of general causation, which asks if a substance can cause injury at realistic consumption levels, and the plaintiffs had focused on lead and arsenic, having dropped theories related to mercury and cadmium.

While the ruling does not end the litigation entirely, it preserves parents' claims alleging that the infant formula caused IQ loss, language disorders, learning disabilities, or sensory processing disorders. The order ended approximately 250 lawsuits in the MDL, and families have the option to appeal the autism and ADHD causation question to the Ninth Circuit.

Who May Qualify

Parents whose children were affected by the baby food products named in the MDL.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the partial summary judgment mean for the baby food lawsuits?

The judge found that the families suing failed to provide admissible evidence to support their claims that lead and arsenic in the baby food caused autism or ADHD. This resulted in the dismissal of many claims related to autism and ADHD.

Are all the claims in the Baby Food Products Liability Litigation dismissed?

No, the litigation is not entirely over. The ruling preserved parents' claims that allege the companies' infant formula caused issues such as IQ loss, language disorders, learning disabilities, or sensory processing disorders.

Related Cases

Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuit Investigation — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuit Investigation

Current
Product Liability
This legal matter involves allegations that chemicals in hair relaxers and straighteners may increase the risk of certain gynecological cancers in women. Thousands of individuals have filed claims against major beauty companies regarding this issue.
Gabapentin and Pregabalin Cognitive Impairment Investigation — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Gabapentin and Pregabalin Cognitive Impairment Investigation

Current
Product Liability
Attorneys are investigating whether manufacturers of gabapentin (Neurontin) and pregabalin (Lyrica) failed to warn consumers about a potential link between long-term use of these medications and cognitive decline. Individuals diagnosed with early-onset dementia or cognitive impairment after taking these drugs may be eligible to seek compensation.
Ram 2500 Stability Control Recall — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Ram 2500 Stability Control Recall

Current
Product Liability
Chrysler is recalling thousands of Ram 2500 pickup trucks due to a defect in the steering column control module that can cause the electronic stability control system to fail. While the recall addresses a safety defect, the content also mentions a separate class action lawsuit against the automaker regarding a different vehicle model.