Product Liability

GM Sierra, Silverado Transmission Defect Class Action

GM Sierra, Silverado Transmission Defect Class Action — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Case Overview

Two California consumers initiated a class action lawsuit against General Motors LLC, alleging that the company equipped its Sierra, Silverado, Canyon, and Colorado pickups with a faulty Hydra-Matic 8L90 or 8L45 transmission. The lawsuit claims that GM sold thousands of these trucks while being aware of a common design flaw that causes issues such as harsh shifting, jerking, and hesitation in lower gears.

The plaintiffs assert that GM knew about the transmission problems as early as 2013 but continued selling the vehicles without disclosing the defect. The legal claims involve allegations that GM violated California's Consumers Legal Remedies Act and Unfair Competition Law by concealing this defect. The suit also references a December 2023 GM technical service bulletin that the plaintiffs argue proves GM knew dealer fixes would be ineffective.

The lawsuit seeks to represent California consumers who purchased a 2019 Sierra, Silverado, Canyon, or Colorado with the specified transmission built after March 1, 2019. The plaintiffs are demanding a jury trial and asking the court to certify the class. The lawsuit is currently filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.

Who May Qualify

California consumers who purchased a 2019 GMC Sierra, Chevrolet Silverado, GMC Canyon, or Chevrolet Colorado equipped with the 8L90 or 8L45 transmission built after March 1, 2019.

Frequently Asked Questions

What specific transmissions are at issue in this lawsuit?

The lawsuit concerns the Hydra-Matic 8L90 or 8L45 transmissions installed in the affected vehicles.

What types of vehicles are covered by this class action?

The class action covers GMC Sierra, Chevrolet Silverado, GMC Canyon, and Chevrolet Colorado pickups.

What laws are the plaintiffs alleging GM violated?

The plaintiffs accuse GM of violating California's Consumers Legal Remedies Act and Unfair Competition Law by hiding the defect.

Related Cases

Mead Johnson Infant Formula NEC Lawsuit — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Mead Johnson Infant Formula NEC Lawsuit

Past
Product Liability
A jury in Illinois rejected claims that Mead Johnson's infant formula caused a premature baby to develop necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). The lawsuit alleges the company failed to warn about the risks associated with its product.
$110M Transamerica Life Insurance Class Action Settlement — Product Liability class action lawsuit

$110M Transamerica Life Insurance Class Action Settlement

Past
Product Liability
Transamerica Life Insurance agreed to a $110 million settlement to resolve claims regarding its failure to properly credit certain cash value increases on specific life insurance policies. The settlement applies to policyholders who owned or owned a universal life insurance policy that was active on January 1, 2016, and was identified by certain product names or attribute codes.
Clorox Contaminated Cleaner Class Action — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Clorox Contaminated Cleaner Class Action

Current
Product Liability
A class action lawsuit alleges that The Clorox Company sold scented cleaning products, such as Mistolin and Lestoil, that were potentially contaminated with the bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The plaintiffs claim the company failed to warn consumers about this danger, especially for those with weakened immune systems.