Consumer Fraud

GoFundMe Accused of Sneaking Default Tips onto Donations

GoFundMe Accused of Sneaking Default Tips onto Donations — Consumer Fraud class action lawsuit

Case Overview

Two donors, Sandra Donovan from Illinois and Ebony Baker from Georgia, initiated a class action lawsuit against GoFundMe Inc. The core allegation is that the platform employed deceptive website design to automatically include optional tips during the donation process, making it difficult for donors to notice or remove these charges.

The plaintiffs contend that GoFundMe utilizes what they term "dark patterns," which constitute a form of negative option marketing. They further allege that the company misrepresents its financial model by suggesting its primary funding comes from tips, while in reality, it collects transaction fees from charitable organizations and fundraisers. The claims assert violations of the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act and the Georgia Fair Business Practices Act, seeking various forms of damages and relief.

The lawsuit is currently filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. Affected consumers are represented by the plaintiffs and can seek to join the class action. The plaintiffs are represented by Amanda J. Rosenberg, Sophia Goren Gold, and Jeffrey D. Kaliel of KalielGold PLLC.

Who May Qualify

Consumers who paid GoFundMe a preselected fee in the form of a tip during the applicable statute of limitations in Illinois and Georgia.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the main allegations against GoFundMe?

The lawsuit alleges that GoFundMe used deceptive website design, or "dark patterns," to automatically add optional tips to donations without the donors' consent. Additionally, the plaintiffs claim the company misrepresents how it funds its operations.

What laws do the plaintiffs claim were violated?

The plaintiffs allege that GoFundMe's practices violate the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act and the Georgia Fair Business Practices Act.

Who is representing the plaintiffs in this lawsuit?

The plaintiffs are represented by Amanda J. Rosenberg, Sophia Goren Gold, and Jeffrey D. Kaliel of KalielGold PLLC.

Related Cases

Samsung M Series TVs Allegedly Falsely Marketed as Mini LED — Consumer Fraud class action lawsuit

Samsung M Series TVs Allegedly Falsely Marketed as Mini LED

Current
Consumer Fraud
A class action lawsuit alleges that Samsung marketed its 2026 M Series televisions as Mini LED when they allegedly lacked the necessary hardware components. The suit claims the marketing was misleading to consumers who purchased the models.
Walmart Settlement Over Expired Infant Formula and Drug Products — Consumer Fraud class action lawsuit

Walmart Settlement Over Expired Infant Formula and Drug Products

Past
Consumer Fraud
Walmart agreed to a $16 million settlement after prosecutors alleged the retailer sold expired infant formula and over-the-counter drugs to consumers in California. The settlement mandates that Walmart implement strict compliance programs to prevent the sale of expired date-sensitive products in its California stores.
Venmo Users Sue PayPal Over Alleged Disclosure of Private Financial Data — Consumer Fraud class action lawsuit

Venmo Users Sue PayPal Over Alleged Disclosure of Private Financial Data

Current
Consumer Fraud
A group of consumers has filed a class action lawsuit against PayPal, which operates the Venmo payment platform, alleging that the company improperly shared private user financial data with third parties without the users' consent.