Antitrust

Google Play Store Antitrust Class Action

Google Play Store Antitrust Class Action — Antitrust class action lawsuit

Case Overview

This landmark antitrust class action alleged that Google unlawfully monopolized the Android app distribution market by requiring developers to use the Google Play Store and its proprietary billing system, which charged commissions of up to 30%. Plaintiffs argued this conduct stifled competition from rival app stores, inflated app prices, and denied consumers the benefits of a free and competitive marketplace — all in violation of federal and state antitrust laws.

In December 2023, Google agreed to pay $700 million to settle claims by approximately 100 million U.S. Android users who purchased apps or in-app content through the Google Play Store between August 2016 and September 2023. Of the total, $630 million was allocated to a consumer restitution fund, with individual payouts varying based on total spending. The settlement also required Google to make structural changes to Play Store policies to allow greater competition in app distribution for a period of seven years.

Who May Qualify

U.S. residents who purchased apps, games, or in-app digital content through the Google Play Store on an Android device between August 16, 2016, and September 30, 2023.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much money will I get from the Google Play Store settlement?

Eligible Android users may receive a minimum of $2, with higher payouts for those who spent more on the Play Store during the class period. The exact amount depends on your total spending and the number of valid claims filed.

Do I need proof of purchase to file a Google Play antitrust claim?

No. Google's records of your purchases are used to verify eligibility. You simply need to submit a valid claim form by the deadline to receive your share of the settlement fund.

What did Google do wrong in the Play Store antitrust case?

Plaintiffs alleged Google illegally forced developers to use its Play Store and payment system exclusively, charging up to 30% commission fees. This allegedly raised prices for consumers and blocked rival app marketplaces from competing fairly.

Related Cases

National Association of Realtors (NAR) Commission Antitrust Settlement — Antitrust class action lawsuit

National Association of Realtors (NAR) Commission Antitrust Settlement

Past
Antitrust
A landmark antitrust verdict and $418 million settlement against the National Association of Realtors found that standard commission-sharing rules illegally inflated real estate agent commissions paid by home sellers across the United States.
Kroger / Albertsons Proposed Merger Antitrust Class Action — Antitrust class action lawsuit

Kroger / Albertsons Proposed Merger Antitrust Class Action

Current
Antitrust
Consumers and labor unions filed suit to block Kroger's proposed $25 billion acquisition of Albertsons, arguing the merger would eliminate competition, raise grocery prices, and harm workers across the United States.
Uber Technologies Antitrust & Driver Wage Suppression Class Action — Antitrust class action lawsuit

Uber Technologies Antitrust & Driver Wage Suppression Class Action

Current
Antitrust
Drivers and riders allege Uber used its dominant market position and algorithmic pricing to artificially suppress driver pay, inflate rider fares, and eliminate competition, in violation of federal antitrust law and California labor statutes.