Antitrust

Google Play Store Antitrust Class Action

Google Play Store Antitrust Class Action — Antitrust class action lawsuit

Case Overview

This landmark antitrust class action alleged that Google unlawfully monopolized the Android app distribution market by requiring developers to use the Google Play Store and its proprietary billing system, which charged commissions of up to 30%. Plaintiffs argued this conduct stifled competition from rival app stores, inflated app prices, and denied consumers the benefits of a free and competitive marketplace — all in violation of federal and state antitrust laws.

In December 2023, Google agreed to pay $700 million to settle claims by approximately 100 million U.S. Android users who purchased apps or in-app content through the Google Play Store between August 2016 and September 2023. Of the total, $630 million was allocated to a consumer restitution fund, with individual payouts varying based on total spending. The settlement also required Google to make structural changes to Play Store policies to allow greater competition in app distribution for a period of seven years.

Who May Qualify

U.S. residents who purchased apps, games, or in-app digital content through the Google Play Store on an Android device between August 16, 2016, and September 30, 2023.

Frequently Asked Questions

How much money will I get from the Google Play Store settlement?

Eligible Android users may receive a minimum of $2, with higher payouts for those who spent more on the Play Store during the class period. The exact amount depends on your total spending and the number of valid claims filed.

Do I need proof of purchase to file a Google Play antitrust claim?

No. Google's records of your purchases are used to verify eligibility. You simply need to submit a valid claim form by the deadline to receive your share of the settlement fund.

What did Google do wrong in the Play Store antitrust case?

Plaintiffs alleged Google illegally forced developers to use its Play Store and payment system exclusively, charging up to 30% commission fees. This allegedly raised prices for consumers and blocked rival app marketplaces from competing fairly.

Related Cases

Blue Cross Antitrust Lawsuit Over Alleged Overcharging in Michigan — Antitrust class action lawsuit

Blue Cross Antitrust Lawsuit Over Alleged Overcharging in Michigan

Current
Antitrust
The state of Michigan filed an antitrust lawsuit against Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Mutual Insurance Company, alleging the insurer violated antitrust laws by conspiring with other Blue Cross Blue Shield entities. The suit claims this conspiracy allowed the company to overcharge the state for administering employee medical benefit plans and harmed Michigan residents by limiting choice and quality in healthcare.
Amazon and Apple Class Action Lawsuit Over Inflated iPad Buy Box Prices — Antitrust class action lawsuit

Amazon and Apple Class Action Lawsuit Over Inflated iPad Buy Box Prices

Current
Antitrust
Two consumers initiated a class action lawsuit alleging that Amazon and Apple colluded to remove third-party resellers from Amazon's marketplace, which allegedly resulted in inflated prices for iPads.
$120M NAR Real Estate Commission Class Action Settlement — Antitrust class action lawsuit

$120M NAR Real Estate Commission Class Action Settlement

Current
Antitrust
The National Association of Realtors and several real estate brokerage companies agreed to pay over $120 million to resolve claims regarding violations of federal antitrust laws related to real estate commissions.