Product Liability

Hair Relaxer Products Uterine Cancer & Ovarian Cancer Mass Tort Litigation

Hair Relaxer Products Uterine Cancer & Ovarian Cancer Mass Tort Litigation — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Case Overview

In October 2022, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) published a study in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute finding that women who used chemical hair straighteners or relaxers more than four times per year were more than twice as likely to develop uterine cancer compared to women who did not use these products. Because chemical hair relaxers are disproportionately marketed to and used by Black women — with some studies estimating that over 60% of Black women use relaxers — civil rights advocates emphasized that this litigation intersects with longstanding issues of environmental racism and consumer product safety inequity. Defendants include major manufacturers such as L'Oréal, Revlon, and Soft Sheen, as well as numerous store-brand relaxer makers.

Plaintiffs allege that the manufacturers knew or should have known that their hair relaxer formulations contained endocrine-disrupting chemicals — including phthalates, parabens, cyclosiloxanes, and bisphenol A — that are associated with hormone-sensitive cancers and reproductive harm, and that they failed to warn consumers of these risks. The litigation was consolidated into a federal multidistrict litigation (MDL) in the Northern District of Illinois in early 2023. Plaintiffs are seeking compensatory and punitive damages for uterine cancer, uterine fibroids, ovarian cancer, and endometriosis. The MDL is moving through discovery, and bellwether trials are expected to be selected in 2025–2026.

Who May Qualify

You may be eligible if you regularly used chemical hair relaxer or hair straightener products for an extended period and were subsequently diagnosed with uterine cancer, uterine fibroids, ovarian cancer, or endometriosis. Claims are particularly strong for individuals who used relaxers more than four times per year for several years prior to diagnosis.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I sue L'Oréal or other hair relaxer companies for uterine cancer?

Yes. Thousands of women have already filed lawsuits against L'Oréal, Revlon, Soft Sheen, and other manufacturers. If you regularly used chemical hair relaxer products and were later diagnosed with uterine cancer, uterine fibroids, or ovarian cancer, you may have a valid claim. Contact a mass tort attorney as soon as possible, as statutes of limitations apply.

What is the NIH study linking hair relaxers to cancer?

A 2022 study by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) found that women who used chemical hair straightening products more than four times per year had a 2.5 times greater risk of developing uterine cancer than non-users. The study tracked over 33,000 U.S. women ages 35–74 over about 11 years. This research forms the scientific backbone of the ongoing litigation.

Has there been a settlement in the hair relaxer cancer lawsuits?

As of mid-2025, the hair relaxer MDL is still in active litigation with no global settlement announced. The court is in the process of selecting bellwether trial cases to test the strength of plaintiffs' claims, which typically precede broader settlement negotiations in MDL proceedings. Anyone with a potential claim should consult an attorney promptly.

Related Cases

Jeep Hybrid SUV Misrepresentation Lawsuit — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Jeep Hybrid SUV Misrepresentation Lawsuit

Current
Product Liability
A group of Jeep owners filed a class action lawsuit alleging that FCA misrepresented the safety and reliability of their hybrid SUVs, specifically the Wrangler 4xe and Grand Cherokee 4xe. The lawsuit claims that FCA failed to properly disclose and repair significant defects in these vehicles, despite marketing them as safe and dependable. The plaintiffs allege that their reliance on FCA's representations led them to purchase or lease the vehicles, and they are seeking damages related to these alleged misrepresentations.
Graco Baby Swing Defect Class Action — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Graco Baby Swing Defect Class Action

Current
Product Liability
A class action lawsuit alleges that Graco's Slim Spaces Compact Baby Swing has a defect causing it to accelerate to dangerous speeds. The complaint claims this defect poses a serious risk of physical harm or death to infants.
Bell & Howell PFAS Cookware Class Action Settlement — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Bell & Howell PFAS Cookware Class Action Settlement

Past
Product Liability
This settlement addresses claims that cookware products from brands like Gotham Steel, Granite Stone, and Bell & Howell were falsely advertised as safe and non-toxic despite containing dangerous chemicals.