Product Liability

Iraq War Lawsuit for Injuries Sustained in Iraq or Afghanistan

Iraq War Lawsuit for Injuries Sustained in Iraq or Afghanistan — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Case Overview

Attorneys are filing lawsuits against the government of Iran, asserting that Iran provided funding, training, and other support to terrorist groups that carried out attacks against U.S. service members and government contractors while they were serving in Iraq and Afghanistan. These claims seek to establish Iran's financial responsibility for the resulting injuries, deaths, and other damages.

Potential qualifying harms include severe injuries such as loss of limbs or eyesight, burns, scarring, gunshot or shrapnel wounds, traumatic brain injuries (TBI), or injuries requiring surgery following a combat blast. The lawsuits are ongoing, with attorneys continuing to investigate and file new claims on behalf of veterans, government contractors, and their qualifying family members.

Who May Qualify

Individuals who served in the U.S. military or worked as a U.S. government contractor in Iraq between 2003 and 2011 or in Afghanistan between 2001 and 2017, who were injured in an enemy attack and experienced a qualifying injury. Family members of those severely injured or killed may also qualify.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who can file a claim in this lawsuit?

The lawsuit can be pursued by U.S. military veterans, government contractors, and their families. This applies to those who were injured or whose family members were killed during attacks while serving in Iraq or Afghanistan.

What types of injuries qualify for compensation?

Qualifying injuries can include, but are not limited to, the loss of a limb or eyesight, burns, scarring, gunshot or shrapnel wounds, traumatic brain injuries (TBI), or injuries that necessitated surgery after a combat blast.

What is the legal basis for suing Iran?

The lawsuits are based on the allegation that Iran supported terrorist groups responsible for the attacks. While foreign governments are usually immune from lawsuits in U.S. courts, U.S. law provides an exception for cases involving countries that support terrorism.

Related Cases

NOW Magnesium Citrate Softgel Mislabeling Investigation — Product Liability class action lawsuit

NOW Magnesium Citrate Softgel Mislabeling Investigation

Current
Product Liability
Attorneys are investigating whether NOW Magnesium Citrate Softgels contain the amount and type of magnesium advertised on the product label. The investigation focuses on potential discrepancies between the label claims and the actual mineral content.
Ozempic & GLP-1 Drugs Vision Loss (NAION) Class Action — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Ozempic & GLP-1 Drugs Vision Loss (NAION) Class Action

Current
Product Liability
Class action lawsuit alleging that Ozempic, Wegovy, and other GLP-1 weight loss drugs are linked to NAION (non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy), a serious condition causing sudden vision loss in users.
Depo-Provera (Medroxyprogesterone) Brain Tumor (Meningioma) Mass Tort Litigation — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Depo-Provera (Medroxyprogesterone) Brain Tumor (Meningioma) Mass Tort Litigation

Current
Product Liability
Women who received long-term Depo-Provera (injectable contraceptive) injections are suing Pfizer, alleging the drug significantly increases the risk of developing meningioma brain tumors and that the company failed to warn patients and physicians of this risk despite knowing about it for years.