Product Liability

Iraq War Lawsuit for Injuries Sustained in Iraq or Afghanistan

Iraq War Lawsuit for Injuries Sustained in Iraq or Afghanistan — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Case Overview

Attorneys are filing lawsuits against the government of Iran, asserting that Iran provided funding, training, and other support to terrorist groups that carried out attacks against U.S. service members and government contractors while they were serving in Iraq and Afghanistan. These claims seek to establish Iran's financial responsibility for the resulting injuries, deaths, and other damages.

Potential qualifying harms include severe injuries such as loss of limbs or eyesight, burns, scarring, gunshot or shrapnel wounds, traumatic brain injuries (TBI), or injuries requiring surgery following a combat blast. The lawsuits are ongoing, with attorneys continuing to investigate and file new claims on behalf of veterans, government contractors, and their qualifying family members.

Who May Qualify

Individuals who served in the U.S. military or worked as a U.S. government contractor in Iraq between 2003 and 2011 or in Afghanistan between 2001 and 2017, who were injured in an enemy attack and experienced a qualifying injury. Family members of those severely injured or killed may also qualify.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who can file a claim in this lawsuit?

The lawsuit can be pursued by U.S. military veterans, government contractors, and their families. This applies to those who were injured or whose family members were killed during attacks while serving in Iraq or Afghanistan.

What types of injuries qualify for compensation?

Qualifying injuries can include, but are not limited to, the loss of a limb or eyesight, burns, scarring, gunshot or shrapnel wounds, traumatic brain injuries (TBI), or injuries that necessitated surgery after a combat blast.

What is the legal basis for suing Iran?

The lawsuits are based on the allegation that Iran supported terrorist groups responsible for the attacks. While foreign governments are usually immune from lawsuits in U.S. courts, U.S. law provides an exception for cases involving countries that support terrorism.

Related Cases

Mead Johnson Infant Formula NEC Lawsuit — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Mead Johnson Infant Formula NEC Lawsuit

Past
Product Liability
A jury in Illinois rejected claims that Mead Johnson's infant formula caused a premature baby to develop necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). The lawsuit alleges the company failed to warn about the risks associated with its product.
$110M Transamerica Life Insurance Class Action Settlement — Product Liability class action lawsuit

$110M Transamerica Life Insurance Class Action Settlement

Past
Product Liability
Transamerica Life Insurance agreed to a $110 million settlement to resolve claims regarding its failure to properly credit certain cash value increases on specific life insurance policies. The settlement applies to policyholders who owned or owned a universal life insurance policy that was active on January 1, 2016, and was identified by certain product names or attribute codes.
Clorox Contaminated Cleaner Class Action — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Clorox Contaminated Cleaner Class Action

Current
Product Liability
A class action lawsuit alleges that The Clorox Company sold scented cleaning products, such as Mistolin and Lestoil, that were potentially contaminated with the bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The plaintiffs claim the company failed to warn consumers about this danger, especially for those with weakened immune systems.