Consumer Fraud

LA Fitness Unwanted Text Message Alleged TCPA Violations

LA Fitness Unwanted Text Message Alleged TCPA Violations — Consumer Fraud class action lawsuit

Case Overview

Anthony Bahar filed a class action lawsuit against Fitness International LLC, the company operating LA Fitness gyms, claiming that the gym sent him unsolicited text messages promoting its services. The lawsuit was filed in the California federal court, alleging that the company continued sending marketing messages despite Bahar having opted out by replying with a stop instruction on July 30, 2026.

The allegations center on violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), which is designed to protect consumers from unwanted telemarketing calls and texts. Bahar claims that LA Fitness ignored his opt-out request, constituting a direct TCPA violation, and further alleges the gym failed to maintain proper opt-out procedures, such as a do-not-call list.

Bahar seeks to represent any United States resident who received two or more text messages from LA Fitness after opting out within the four years preceding the filing. He is suing for TCPA violations, seeking $500 in damages per call, up to $1,500 for willful violations, and injunctive relief to force the company to stop sending unwanted messages.

Who May Qualify

Anyone in the United States who received two or more text messages from LA Fitness after opting out within four years prior to the filing of the lawsuit.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the basis of the lawsuit?

The lawsuit alleges that LA Fitness sent unwanted marketing text messages to consumers even after those consumers had explicitly requested to opt out of receiving such communications.

What law is allegedly violated?

The complaint alleges violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), which aims to protect consumers from unwanted telemarketing calls and text messages.

What are the damages sought?

The plaintiff is seeking damages for TCPA violations, including $500 per call, with potential damages up to $1,500 for willful or knowing violations.

Related Cases

FanDuel Lawsuit Over Alleged Exploitation of Users with Targeted Promotions — Consumer Fraud class action lawsuit

FanDuel Lawsuit Over Alleged Exploitation of Users with Targeted Promotions

Current
Consumer Fraud
A Pennsylvania resident has filed a lawsuit alleging that FanDuel's sports gambling applications are intentionally designed to be addictive and exploit user vulnerabilities through targeted marketing.
$30M Equifax Hard Inquiry Dispute Class Action Settlement — Consumer Fraud class action lawsuit

$30M Equifax Hard Inquiry Dispute Class Action Settlement

Current
Consumer Fraud
Equifax agreed to pay $30 million to settle a class action lawsuit concerning its failure to properly investigate consumer disputes regarding hard inquiries on credit reports. The settlement applies to individuals in the United States and its territories who disputed hard inquiries with Equifax during specific timeframes. Class members must submit a valid claim form by November 29, 2026, to receive potential payments.
Aldi Alleged Unequal Pricing for SNAP/EBT Shoppers — Consumer Fraud class action lawsuit

Aldi Alleged Unequal Pricing for SNAP/EBT Shoppers

Current
Consumer Fraud
A class action lawsuit has been filed alleging that Aldi charged higher prices to shoppers using SNAP/EBT benefits and improperly applied these benefits toward fees. The complaint claims this practice constitutes unequal treatment compared to other customers.