Product Liability

Lawsuit Over AirTag Stalking Allegations

Lawsuit Over AirTag Stalking Allegations — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Case Overview

The lawsuit was initiated by Jane Doe M.R. 1 against Apple Inc., alleging that the AirTag product facilitates stalking and unwanted tracking. The plaintiff claims that the tracking device, which utilizes an Apple device, was used to approach, grab, and follow her into a store by a 70-year-old man. Furthermore, the complaint asserts that Apple released the AirTag in 2021 despite knowing it could be used by dangerous individuals to track, coerce, and endanger victims, and that adequate safeguards were not in place.

The allegations detail that the AirTags emit Bluetooth signals detected by the Find My network, which is composed of millions of nearby Apple devices, allowing for reliable location transmission. The plaintiff is suing under claims of negligence, strict product liability, consumer fraud, and invasion of privacy. She is seeking monetary damages and a court order to prevent Apple from engaging in further unlawful or unfair practices concerning the design, manufacture, and sale of the AirTags.

This filing is the latest legal action, following a previous attempt to certify a class action which was declined by a judge. Affected individuals who believe an Apple AirTag was used to track, stalk, harass, or physically harm them may qualify to take legal action. The plaintiff is represented by Molly C. Wells and Edward A. Wallace of Wallace Miller.

Who May Qualify

Individuals who believe an Apple AirTag was used to track, stalk, harass, or physically harm them.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the basis of the lawsuit against Apple?

The lawsuit alleges that Apple's AirTag products facilitate stalking and unwanted tracking. The plaintiff claims Apple was aware of the potential for misuse by dangerous individuals when releasing the product.

What specific legal claims are being brought?

The plaintiff is suing for negligence, strict product liability, consumer fraud, and invasion of privacy. She is seeking damages and a court order to stop unfair practices related to the AirTags.

What evidence is cited regarding the AirTags' use?

The lawsuit mentions that Apple received over 40,000 AirTag stalking reports between April 20, 2021, and April 5, 2024, and an average of over 1,000 complaints per month concerning the product.

Related Cases

$15M Levoit Air Purifier Class Action Settlement — Product Liability class action lawsuit

$15M Levoit Air Purifier Class Action Settlement

Current
Product Liability
Vesync agreed to a $15 million settlement to resolve claims that it falsely advertised Levoit air purifiers as having "True HEPA" filters. The settlement applies to consumers who bought specific Levoit-branded air purifiers or replacement filters with certain filtration claims.
Video Game Addiction Lawsuit Investigation — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Video Game Addiction Lawsuit Investigation

Current
Product Liability
This investigation concerns allegations that certain video game companies designed their games with features intended to keep players engaged for long periods. Plaintiffs claim these design elements contributed to gaming addiction and related harms among minors and young adults.
Ram 2025 Trucks Dangerous Engine Defect Class Action — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Ram 2025 Trucks Dangerous Engine Defect Class Action

Current
Product Liability
Two truck owners filed a class action lawsuit against FCA US LLC, alleging that 2025 model year Ram 1500 trucks have a dangerous engine defect. The lawsuit claims the automaker failed to disclose this defect, which can cause sudden power loss while driving.