Product Liability

Lawsuit Over AirTag Stalking Allegations

Lawsuit Over AirTag Stalking Allegations — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Case Overview

The lawsuit was initiated by Jane Doe M.R. 1 against Apple Inc., alleging that the AirTag product facilitates stalking and unwanted tracking. The plaintiff claims that the tracking device, which utilizes an Apple device, was used to approach, grab, and follow her into a store by a 70-year-old man. Furthermore, the complaint asserts that Apple released the AirTag in 2021 despite knowing it could be used by dangerous individuals to track, coerce, and endanger victims, and that adequate safeguards were not in place.

The allegations detail that the AirTags emit Bluetooth signals detected by the Find My network, which is composed of millions of nearby Apple devices, allowing for reliable location transmission. The plaintiff is suing under claims of negligence, strict product liability, consumer fraud, and invasion of privacy. She is seeking monetary damages and a court order to prevent Apple from engaging in further unlawful or unfair practices concerning the design, manufacture, and sale of the AirTags.

This filing is the latest legal action, following a previous attempt to certify a class action which was declined by a judge. Affected individuals who believe an Apple AirTag was used to track, stalk, harass, or physically harm them may qualify to take legal action. The plaintiff is represented by Molly C. Wells and Edward A. Wallace of Wallace Miller.

Who May Qualify

Individuals who believe an Apple AirTag was used to track, stalk, harass, or physically harm them.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the basis of the lawsuit against Apple?

The lawsuit alleges that Apple's AirTag products facilitate stalking and unwanted tracking. The plaintiff claims Apple was aware of the potential for misuse by dangerous individuals when releasing the product.

What specific legal claims are being brought?

The plaintiff is suing for negligence, strict product liability, consumer fraud, and invasion of privacy. She is seeking damages and a court order to stop unfair practices related to the AirTags.

What evidence is cited regarding the AirTags' use?

The lawsuit mentions that Apple received over 40,000 AirTag stalking reports between April 20, 2021, and April 5, 2024, and an average of over 1,000 complaints per month concerning the product.

Related Cases

Mead Johnson Infant Formula NEC Lawsuit — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Mead Johnson Infant Formula NEC Lawsuit

Past
Product Liability
A jury in Illinois rejected claims that Mead Johnson's infant formula caused a premature baby to develop necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). The lawsuit alleges the company failed to warn about the risks associated with its product.
$110M Transamerica Life Insurance Class Action Settlement — Product Liability class action lawsuit

$110M Transamerica Life Insurance Class Action Settlement

Past
Product Liability
Transamerica Life Insurance agreed to a $110 million settlement to resolve claims regarding its failure to properly credit certain cash value increases on specific life insurance policies. The settlement applies to policyholders who owned or owned a universal life insurance policy that was active on January 1, 2016, and was identified by certain product names or attribute codes.
Clorox Contaminated Cleaner Class Action — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Clorox Contaminated Cleaner Class Action

Current
Product Liability
A class action lawsuit alleges that The Clorox Company sold scented cleaning products, such as Mistolin and Lestoil, that were potentially contaminated with the bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The plaintiffs claim the company failed to warn consumers about this danger, especially for those with weakened immune systems.