Antitrust

Meijer / Kroger / Albertsons Employer Antitrust No-Hire Conspiracy Litigation

Meijer / Kroger / Albertsons Employer Antitrust No-Hire Conspiracy Litigation — Antitrust class action lawsuit

Case Overview

This class action lawsuit was filed in 2024 by grocery store employees who alleged that Kroger and Albertsons — the two largest supermarket chains in the United States — entered into an illegal no-hire and no-solicitation agreement during the pendency of their proposed $25 billion merger. Workers claim that by agreeing not to recruit or hire each other's employees, the companies effectively eliminated a key source of competitive wage pressure, preventing workers from leveraging competing job offers to secure better pay and benefits. Such agreements have been increasingly scrutinized by the Department of Justice and the FTC as per se violations of federal antitrust law.

The case follows the FTC's successful move to block the Kroger-Albertsons merger in late 2024 on separate grounds. Plaintiffs argue that even if the merger itself was abandoned, the alleged labor market allocation agreement caused real harm to hundreds of thousands of grocery workers across the country during the years the agreement was in effect. The lawsuit seeks damages equal to the wages and benefits workers allegedly lost as a direct result of suppressed competition for their labor, as well as injunctive relief to prevent similar conduct in future merger negotiations.

Who May Qualify

Current or former employees of Kroger-owned or Albertsons-owned grocery stores in the United States who worked at those stores during the period of the alleged no-hire agreement (approximately 2022–2024) and whose wages or job opportunities were allegedly suppressed as a result.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Kroger and Albertsons no-hire antitrust lawsuit about?

The lawsuit alleges that Kroger and Albertsons secretly agreed not to recruit or hire each other's employees while their proposed $25 billion merger was pending. Workers claim this illegal agreement suppressed wages and job mobility for hundreds of thousands of grocery store workers in violation of federal antitrust law.

Can Kroger or Albertsons employees join the no-hire antitrust class action?

Potentially yes. Current and former employees of Kroger and Albertsons who worked at those stores during the alleged agreement period (roughly 2022–2024) may be eligible class members. The case is still in early litigation stages and no settlement has been announced.

Did the FTC block the Kroger-Albertsons merger?

Yes. A federal judge sided with the FTC in late 2024 and blocked the proposed $25 billion Kroger-Albertsons merger on antitrust grounds. The no-hire worker lawsuit is a separate proceeding seeking compensation for employees allegedly harmed during the merger negotiation period.

Related Cases

Blue Cross Antitrust Lawsuit Over Alleged Overcharging in Michigan — Antitrust class action lawsuit

Blue Cross Antitrust Lawsuit Over Alleged Overcharging in Michigan

Current
Antitrust
The state of Michigan filed an antitrust lawsuit against Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Mutual Insurance Company, alleging the insurer violated antitrust laws by conspiring with other Blue Cross Blue Shield entities. The suit claims this conspiracy allowed the company to overcharge the state for administering employee medical benefit plans and harmed Michigan residents by limiting choice and quality in healthcare.
Amazon and Apple Class Action Lawsuit Over Inflated iPad Buy Box Prices — Antitrust class action lawsuit

Amazon and Apple Class Action Lawsuit Over Inflated iPad Buy Box Prices

Current
Antitrust
Two consumers initiated a class action lawsuit alleging that Amazon and Apple colluded to remove third-party resellers from Amazon's marketplace, which allegedly resulted in inflated prices for iPads.
$120M NAR Real Estate Commission Class Action Settlement — Antitrust class action lawsuit

$120M NAR Real Estate Commission Class Action Settlement

Current
Antitrust
The National Association of Realtors and several real estate brokerage companies agreed to pay over $120 million to resolve claims regarding violations of federal antitrust laws related to real estate commissions.