Product Liability

Merrill Lynch Retirement Cash Sweep Accounts Settlement

Merrill Lynch Retirement Cash Sweep Accounts Settlement — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Case Overview

The lawsuit involves Bank of America’s Merrill Lynch unit, which has agreed to pay $39 million to settle claims brought by retirement account holders. The core allegation is that the firm moved customers' uninvested retirement funds into low-interest cash sweep accounts instead of paying the rates customers were entitled to under their agreements with the company.

The proposed class action settlement addresses claims from account holders who kept cash balances in Merrill Edge retirement accounts that were swept into Merrill Lynch’s Retirement Asset Savings Program between December 15, 2016, and March 15, 2020. The complaint alleges that Merrill Lynch failed to secure the necessary prior written affirmative consent from customers before sweeping these funds, and further claims that the company obscured details about these sweep accounts within its agreements.

The settlement was reached on September 1, avoiding a trial. While claim-filing instructions are not yet available, the settlement resolves claims for customers whose retirement account cash was swept through the program during the specified period. Merrill Lynch has not admitted any wrongdoing as part of this agreement.

Who May Qualify

Account holders who maintained Merrill Edge retirement accounts with cash balances swept into Merrill Lynch’s Retirement Asset Savings Program between December 15, 2016, and March 15, 2020.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the basis of the lawsuit against Merrill Lynch?

The lawsuit alleges that Merrill Lynch swept idle cash from customers' retirement accounts into low-interest cash sweep accounts. The complaint further claims the company failed to obtain the required prior written affirmative consent before sweeping the funds and buried disclosures about the accounts within its agreements.

What is the current status of the settlement?

Merrill Lynch has agreed to pay $39 million to settle the class action lawsuit. However, the article notes that claim-filing instructions are not yet available, and affected people are advised to sign up for updates.

What was the legal basis for the claims?

The complaint alleges that federal Securities and Exchange Commission regulations require brokerage firms to obtain a customer’s prior written affirmative consent before sweeping cash into affiliated accounts or entities.

Related Cases

Jeep Hybrid SUV Misrepresentation Lawsuit — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Jeep Hybrid SUV Misrepresentation Lawsuit

Current
Product Liability
A group of Jeep owners filed a class action lawsuit alleging that FCA misrepresented the safety and reliability of their hybrid SUVs, specifically the Wrangler 4xe and Grand Cherokee 4xe. The lawsuit claims that FCA failed to properly disclose and repair significant defects in these vehicles, despite marketing them as safe and dependable. The plaintiffs allege that their reliance on FCA's representations led them to purchase or lease the vehicles, and they are seeking damages related to these alleged misrepresentations.
Graco Baby Swing Defect Class Action — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Graco Baby Swing Defect Class Action

Current
Product Liability
A class action lawsuit alleges that Graco's Slim Spaces Compact Baby Swing has a defect causing it to accelerate to dangerous speeds. The complaint claims this defect poses a serious risk of physical harm or death to infants.
Bell & Howell PFAS Cookware Class Action Settlement — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Bell & Howell PFAS Cookware Class Action Settlement

Past
Product Liability
This settlement addresses claims that cookware products from brands like Gotham Steel, Granite Stone, and Bell & Howell were falsely advertised as safe and non-toxic despite containing dangerous chemicals.