Consumer Fraud

Meta and Luxottica Allegedly Violate Right to Repair Law

Meta and Luxottica Allegedly Violate Right to Repair Law — Consumer Fraud class action lawsuit

Case Overview

A Denver electronics repair shop named Acme Revival Inc. initiated a lawsuit against Luxottica Group S.p.A., Luxottica of America Inc., Meta Platforms Inc., and Meta Platforms Technologies LLC. The core allegation is that the defendants violated Colorado law by not supplying the necessary resources to repair Ray-Ban Meta smart glasses.

The plaintiff contends that the companies failed to comply with Colorado’s Consumer Repair Bill of Rights Act, which mandates that manufacturers furnish independent repair providers with essential repair materials for digital electronics. Acme claims that despite making multiple requests for materials, the companies either did not respond or redirected the repair to warranty services or replacements, harming Acme's business and customer relationships.

Acme is seeking a court order compelling Luxottica and Meta to provide the required repair materials under fair and reasonable terms, alongside compensation for the resulting losses. The lawsuit was filed in the District Court of Denver County, Colorado, and the plaintiff is represented by Anthony A. Garcia of The Anthony A. Garcia Law Firm.

Who May Qualify

The lawsuit concerns the failure to provide repair resources for Ray-Ban Meta smart glasses, affecting consumers and repair businesses in the scope of the law.

Frequently Asked Questions

What law is the lawsuit based on?

The lawsuit alleges a violation of Colorado’s Consumer Repair Bill of Rights Act. This act requires manufacturers to give independent repair providers the necessary materials to fix digital electronic equipment, such as Meta smart glasses.

What does the plaintiff claim was the impact of the companies' actions?

Acme Revival claims that the failure of Luxottica and Meta to provide repair materials caused the business to lose revenue, profits, and business opportunities, while also harming its customer relationships.

What is the current status of the case?

The lawsuit, Acme Revival Inc. v. Luxottica Group S.p.A., et al., was filed in the District Court of Denver County, Colorado, and the details provided suggest the matter is ongoing.

Related Cases

FanDuel Lawsuit Over Alleged Exploitation of Users with Targeted Promotions — Consumer Fraud class action lawsuit

FanDuel Lawsuit Over Alleged Exploitation of Users with Targeted Promotions

Current
Consumer Fraud
A Pennsylvania resident has filed a lawsuit alleging that FanDuel's sports gambling applications are intentionally designed to be addictive and exploit user vulnerabilities through targeted marketing.
$30M Equifax Hard Inquiry Dispute Class Action Settlement — Consumer Fraud class action lawsuit

$30M Equifax Hard Inquiry Dispute Class Action Settlement

Current
Consumer Fraud
Equifax agreed to pay $30 million to settle a class action lawsuit concerning its failure to properly investigate consumer disputes regarding hard inquiries on credit reports. The settlement applies to individuals in the United States and its territories who disputed hard inquiries with Equifax during specific timeframes. Class members must submit a valid claim form by November 29, 2026, to receive potential payments.
Aldi Alleged Unequal Pricing for SNAP/EBT Shoppers — Consumer Fraud class action lawsuit

Aldi Alleged Unequal Pricing for SNAP/EBT Shoppers

Current
Consumer Fraud
A class action lawsuit has been filed alleging that Aldi charged higher prices to shoppers using SNAP/EBT benefits and improperly applied these benefits toward fees. The complaint claims this practice constitutes unequal treatment compared to other customers.