Antitrust

National Grid / Utility Overpayment & ERISA Pension Underfunding Class Action

National Grid / Utility Overpayment & ERISA Pension Underfunding Class Action — Antitrust class action lawsuit

Case Overview

In August 2024, a federal judge ruled that Google had illegally maintained a monopoly in the U.S. general search engine and search text advertising markets, finding that the company paid billions of dollars annually to Apple, Samsung, and other device makers to be the default search engine — effectively locking out competitors. Following this landmark DOJ victory, private plaintiffs filed class action antitrust lawsuits in early 2025 on behalf of advertisers who allege they were forced to pay supracompetitive prices for search advertising on Google's platform due to the absence of meaningful competition, and consumers who were denied access to a competitive search market.

The class actions seek treble damages under the Sherman Antitrust Act, claiming that Google's exclusionary default agreements and self-preferencing practices inflated advertising costs that were ultimately passed through to consumers in the form of higher product and service prices. The plaintiffs' cases are closely tied to the DOJ's remedies phase, in which the government is seeking structural remedies — potentially including forced divestiture of Chrome or Android — that could reshape the internet economy. These private suits represent potentially billions of dollars in additional liability beyond any government-imposed penalties and are being closely watched by both the tech industry and antitrust scholars worldwide.

Who May Qualify

U.S. businesses or individuals who purchased search advertising directly from Google (Google Ads/AdWords) between approximately 2014 and the present, or U.S. consumers who used Google Search during the relevant period and may have paid higher prices for goods and services as a downstream result of inflated advertising costs.

Frequently Asked Questions

Did Google lose its antitrust case and can I sue them?

Yes — in August 2024, a federal judge found Google illegally monopolized the search engine and search advertising markets. This ruling opened the door for private class action antitrust suits. Advertisers and potentially consumers who were harmed by Google's monopolistic practices may be eligible to join ongoing class actions seeking treble damages.

How does the Google antitrust lawsuit affect everyday consumers?

The lawsuit alleges that Google's monopoly over search advertising drove up ad prices for businesses, who then passed those costs on to consumers through higher prices for goods and services online. Consumers may be entitled to compensation as indirect purchasers under state antitrust laws if class actions succeed.

Related Cases

Butterball and Hormel Turkey Price-Fixing Settlements — Antitrust class action lawsuit

Butterball and Hormel Turkey Price-Fixing Settlements

Current
Antitrust
Direct purchasers of turkey products reached settlements with major producers Butterball, Hormel, and Jennie-O regarding allegations of price-fixing. The settlements were approved by an Illinois federal judge, resolving the direct purchasers' claims in the long-running litigation.
McDonald's Alleged Algorithmic Price-Fixing Class Action — Antitrust class action lawsuit

McDonald's Alleged Algorithmic Price-Fixing Class Action

Current
Antitrust
A class action lawsuit has been filed alleging that McDonald's used a centralized algorithmic system to manipulate and increase menu prices across its franchise locations. The suit claims this system pressured independent franchisees to adopt the company's recommended pricing, resulting in higher costs for consumers.
Expedia Antitrust Class Action Over Inflated Hotel Prices — Antitrust class action lawsuit

Expedia Antitrust Class Action Over Inflated Hotel Prices

Current
Antitrust
Three consumers initiated a class action lawsuit against Expedia Group, alleging that the company artificially inflated hotel rates by restricting hotels from offering lower prices on other websites. The suit claims Expedia abused its market dominance through exclusionary contracts and pricing algorithms, violating federal antitrust laws.