Antitrust

NFL Sunday Ticket Antitrust Class Action

NFL Sunday Ticket Antitrust Class Action — Antitrust class action lawsuit

Case Overview

For decades, the NFL has maintained an exclusive licensing arrangement under which out-of-market regular season games were only available to fans through the DirecTV Sunday Ticket package — a premium subscription that cost subscribers upward of $400 per season. Plaintiffs argue that this exclusivity deal, shielded from antitrust scrutiny by the Sports Broadcasting Act of 1961, was weaponized to artificially restrict the availability of live game broadcasts and force consumers and commercial establishments to pay supracompetitive prices. The case alleges that in a competitive market, out-of-market games would be available across multiple platforms at far lower prices.

In June 2023, a federal jury awarded plaintiffs a staggering $4.7 billion verdict — which under antitrust law's treble damages provision could have reached $14.1 billion — making it one of the largest antitrust jury awards in U.S. history. However, U.S. District Judge Philip Gutierrez vacated the jury verdict in August 2023, finding errors in how damages were calculated and instructed. Plaintiffs appealed the decision to the Ninth Circuit, where the case remains active as of 2025. The litigation has taken on renewed relevance as the NFL has expanded Sunday Ticket distribution to YouTube TV and YouTube Primetime Channels, but plaintiffs argue subscribers are still owed compensation for years of inflated pricing.

Who May Qualify

Residential consumers who subscribed to DirecTV's NFL Sunday Ticket package at any time between June 2011 and February 2023, and commercial establishments (bars, restaurants) that paid for commercial Sunday Ticket subscriptions during the same period.

Frequently Asked Questions

Did the NFL Sunday Ticket lawsuit win?

A federal jury awarded plaintiffs $4.7 billion in June 2023, but the verdict was vacated by the trial judge in August 2023 due to a legal error in damages calculation. Plaintiffs appealed, and the case is currently before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, so a final outcome has not yet been reached.

Who is eligible for the NFL Sunday Ticket class action?

Residential DirecTV subscribers who paid for NFL Sunday Ticket between June 2011 and February 2023 are potentially eligible, as are bars, restaurants, and other commercial establishments that paid for commercial Sunday Ticket subscriptions during that period.

Why is NFL Sunday Ticket an antitrust violation?

Plaintiffs argue the NFL's exclusive deal with DirecTV artificially restricted out-of-market game broadcasts to a single distributor, eliminating competition and forcing fans to pay inflated prices. This type of market allocation agreement, they claim, violates the Sherman Antitrust Act.

Related Cases

Blue Cross Antitrust Lawsuit Over Alleged Overcharging in Michigan — Antitrust class action lawsuit

Blue Cross Antitrust Lawsuit Over Alleged Overcharging in Michigan

Current
Antitrust
The state of Michigan filed an antitrust lawsuit against Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Mutual Insurance Company, alleging the insurer violated antitrust laws by conspiring with other Blue Cross Blue Shield entities. The suit claims this conspiracy allowed the company to overcharge the state for administering employee medical benefit plans and harmed Michigan residents by limiting choice and quality in healthcare.
Amazon and Apple Class Action Lawsuit Over Inflated iPad Buy Box Prices — Antitrust class action lawsuit

Amazon and Apple Class Action Lawsuit Over Inflated iPad Buy Box Prices

Current
Antitrust
Two consumers initiated a class action lawsuit alleging that Amazon and Apple colluded to remove third-party resellers from Amazon's marketplace, which allegedly resulted in inflated prices for iPads.
$120M NAR Real Estate Commission Class Action Settlement — Antitrust class action lawsuit

$120M NAR Real Estate Commission Class Action Settlement

Current
Antitrust
The National Association of Realtors and several real estate brokerage companies agreed to pay over $120 million to resolve claims regarding violations of federal antitrust laws related to real estate commissions.