Product Liability

Plum Organics Heavy Metal Testing Disclosure Agreement

Plum Organics Heavy Metal Testing Disclosure Agreement — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Case Overview

Plum Organics, an organic baby food manufacturer, entered into a voluntary compliance agreement with the Texas Attorney General's Office. This agreement stems from an industry-wide investigation opened by the Texas Attorney General's office in August 2025 due to concerns about toxic metals found in baby food products. Plum cooperated with this investigation, which was prompted by a class action lawsuit filed in May accusing several companies of selling contaminated baby food.

Under the terms of the agreement, Plum must continue to test its baby food products for heavy metals, including lead, arsenic, cadmium, and mercury. The company must adhere to specific safety guidelines, such as U.S. FDA guidance for lead and EU guidance for cadmium and inorganic arsenic. Furthermore, Plum is required to continue posting lab results for all individual products sold in Texas, covering baby food in jars, pouches, tubs, or boxes for children under two years of age.

The agreement mandates these commitments for a period of three years from the court's signing date and does not include any monetary penalties or payments to consumers. The Texas Attorney General's Office noted that its broader investigation into heavy metals in baby food remains ongoing. Individuals who believe their child was affected by contaminated baby food may be eligible to pursue compensation through an ongoing baby food lawsuit investigation.

Who May Qualify

Individuals with a child diagnosed with autism who believe the condition is linked to contaminated baby food.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does the agreement require Plum Organics to do?

Plum Organics must continue testing its baby food for heavy metals and publishing the results online. The agreement also requires the company to follow specific safety limits set by regulatory bodies.

Does this agreement mean Plum Organics admitted to wrongdoing?

No, the agreement does not accuse the company of any wrongdoing, nor does it contain any findings that the company sold contaminated baby food.

What types of baby food are covered by this agreement?

The commitments cover baby food packaged in jars, pouches, tubs, or boxes intended for children who are under the age of two.

Related Cases

Jeep Hybrid SUV Misrepresentation Lawsuit — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Jeep Hybrid SUV Misrepresentation Lawsuit

Current
Product Liability
A group of Jeep owners filed a class action lawsuit alleging that FCA misrepresented the safety and reliability of their hybrid SUVs, specifically the Wrangler 4xe and Grand Cherokee 4xe. The lawsuit claims that FCA failed to properly disclose and repair significant defects in these vehicles, despite marketing them as safe and dependable. The plaintiffs allege that their reliance on FCA's representations led them to purchase or lease the vehicles, and they are seeking damages related to these alleged misrepresentations.
Graco Baby Swing Defect Class Action — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Graco Baby Swing Defect Class Action

Current
Product Liability
A class action lawsuit alleges that Graco's Slim Spaces Compact Baby Swing has a defect causing it to accelerate to dangerous speeds. The complaint claims this defect poses a serious risk of physical harm or death to infants.
Bell & Howell PFAS Cookware Class Action Settlement — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Bell & Howell PFAS Cookware Class Action Settlement

Past
Product Liability
This settlement addresses claims that cookware products from brands like Gotham Steel, Granite Stone, and Bell & Howell were falsely advertised as safe and non-toxic despite containing dangerous chemicals.