Product Liability

QDOBA Class Action Over Salmonella-Contaminated Jalapeños

QDOBA Class Action Over Salmonella-Contaminated Jalapeños — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Case Overview

Two consumers initiated a class action lawsuit against QDOBA Restaurant Corp., Butterfly Equity LP, and jalapeño supplier Coast Citrus Distributors LLC. The plaintiffs contend that jalapeños provided by Coast Citrus and served at QDOBA were the source of a multi-state Salmonella outbreak, with initial reports linking the illness to jalapeños grown in Sinaloa, Mexico.

The lawsuit alleges that the defendants failed to ensure the jalapeños were safe for consumption and did not warn consumers about the risk of Salmonella infection through proper labeling or warnings. The claims assert violations of several state laws, including California's Unfair Competition Law, Colorado's Consumer Protection Act, and Oregon's Unlawful Trade Practices Act, alongside claims for strict product liability, negligence, and unjust enrichment.

The plaintiffs are seeking compensatory, statutory, and punitive damages, as well as restitution, and an order preventing QDOBA and Coast Citrus from continuing to sell the jalapeños with the current labeling. The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, and the plaintiffs are seeking to represent a nationwide class of consumers.

Who May Qualify

Consumers who purchased jalapeños distributed by Coast Citrus at QDOBA, including subclasses for Colorado and Oregon.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is involved in the QDOBA Salmonella lawsuit?

The class action lawsuit was filed against QDOBA Restaurant Corp., its parent company Butterfly Equity LP, and the jalapeño supplier Coast Citrus Distributors LLC.

What is the basis of the Salmonella contamination claim?

The plaintiffs claim that jalapeños supplied by Coast Citrus and served at QDOBA caused a multi-state Salmonella outbreak, which federal health officials linked to jalapeños grown in Sinaloa, Mexico.

What legal actions are the plaintiffs pursuing?

The plaintiffs are alleging violations of various state laws, including Unfair Competition Law and Consumer Protection Acts, and are seeking damages and an order to change labeling practices.

Related Cases

Mead Johnson Infant Formula NEC Lawsuit — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Mead Johnson Infant Formula NEC Lawsuit

Past
Product Liability
A jury in Illinois rejected claims that Mead Johnson's infant formula caused a premature baby to develop necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). The lawsuit alleges the company failed to warn about the risks associated with its product.
$110M Transamerica Life Insurance Class Action Settlement — Product Liability class action lawsuit

$110M Transamerica Life Insurance Class Action Settlement

Past
Product Liability
Transamerica Life Insurance agreed to a $110 million settlement to resolve claims regarding its failure to properly credit certain cash value increases on specific life insurance policies. The settlement applies to policyholders who owned or owned a universal life insurance policy that was active on January 1, 2016, and was identified by certain product names or attribute codes.
Clorox Contaminated Cleaner Class Action — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Clorox Contaminated Cleaner Class Action

Current
Product Liability
A class action lawsuit alleges that The Clorox Company sold scented cleaning products, such as Mistolin and Lestoil, that were potentially contaminated with the bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The plaintiffs claim the company failed to warn consumers about this danger, especially for those with weakened immune systems.