Product Liability

QDOBA Class Action Over Salmonella-Contaminated Jalapeños

QDOBA Class Action Over Salmonella-Contaminated Jalapeños — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Case Overview

Two consumers initiated a class action lawsuit against QDOBA Restaurant Corp., Butterfly Equity LP, and jalapeño supplier Coast Citrus Distributors LLC. The plaintiffs contend that jalapeños provided by Coast Citrus and served at QDOBA were the source of a multi-state Salmonella outbreak, with initial reports linking the illness to jalapeños grown in Sinaloa, Mexico.

The lawsuit alleges that the defendants failed to ensure the jalapeños were safe for consumption and did not warn consumers about the risk of Salmonella infection through proper labeling or warnings. The claims assert violations of several state laws, including California's Unfair Competition Law, Colorado's Consumer Protection Act, and Oregon's Unlawful Trade Practices Act, alongside claims for strict product liability, negligence, and unjust enrichment.

The plaintiffs are seeking compensatory, statutory, and punitive damages, as well as restitution, and an order preventing QDOBA and Coast Citrus from continuing to sell the jalapeños with the current labeling. The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, and the plaintiffs are seeking to represent a nationwide class of consumers.

Who May Qualify

Consumers who purchased jalapeños distributed by Coast Citrus at QDOBA, including subclasses for Colorado and Oregon.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is involved in the QDOBA Salmonella lawsuit?

The class action lawsuit was filed against QDOBA Restaurant Corp., its parent company Butterfly Equity LP, and the jalapeño supplier Coast Citrus Distributors LLC.

What is the basis of the Salmonella contamination claim?

The plaintiffs claim that jalapeños supplied by Coast Citrus and served at QDOBA caused a multi-state Salmonella outbreak, which federal health officials linked to jalapeños grown in Sinaloa, Mexico.

What legal actions are the plaintiffs pursuing?

The plaintiffs are alleging violations of various state laws, including Unfair Competition Law and Consumer Protection Acts, and are seeking damages and an order to change labeling practices.

Related Cases

Baby Brezza Formula Maker Misrepresentation Lawsuit — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Baby Brezza Formula Maker Misrepresentation Lawsuit

Current
Product Liability
Parents filed a class action lawsuit alleging that Baby Brezza and The Betesh Group falsely advertised their Formula Maker machine as accurately dispensing baby formula. The plaintiffs claim the device dispensed insufficient amounts of formula powder, potentially harming infants.
Taste of the Wild Grain-Free Dog Food Heart Disease Lawsuit — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Taste of the Wild Grain-Free Dog Food Heart Disease Lawsuit

Current
Product Liability
This class action lawsuit alleges that the company marketed its grain-free dog food as safe and healthy when it may actually cause heart disease in dogs. The plaintiffs claim the product increases the risk of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), a potentially fatal condition.
Iraq War Lawsuit for Injuries Sustained in Iraq or Afghanistan — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Iraq War Lawsuit for Injuries Sustained in Iraq or Afghanistan

Current
Product Liability
This legal action involves claims filed against the government of Iran, alleging that Iran supported terrorist groups responsible for attacks on American service members and contractors in Iraq and Afghanistan. The lawsuits aim to hold Iran financially accountable for the injuries and harm caused by these attacks.