Product Liability

Ram 2025 Trucks Dangerous Engine Defect Class Action

Ram 2025 Trucks Dangerous Engine Defect Class Action — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Case Overview

The lawsuit was initiated by Charlene Norberg and Tim Craig against FCA US LLC, alleging that the automaker sold 2025 model year Ram 1500 trucks containing a dangerous engine defect. The complaint points to a latent issue in vehicles equipped with 3.0L Hurricane engines that were distributed across the United States.

The plaintiffs contend that FCA failed to disclose a defect in the engine control module and/or powertrain control module. This alleged defect can cause issues such as persistent diagnostic trouble codes, check engine lights, drivability problems, and loss of engine power or power brakes. The claims involve breaches of warranty, fraudulent concealment, and violations of state and federal consumer laws.

The plaintiffs are seeking to represent current or former owners and/or lessees of the 2025 model year Ram 1500 truck in the United States. The lawsuit is currently filed in the Michigan federal court, and the plaintiffs are seeking class certification, damages, and a jury trial.

Who May Qualify

Current or former owners and/or lessees of a 2025 model year Ram 1500 truck in the United States.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the alleged defect in the Ram 1500 trucks?

The class action lawsuit alleges a latent defect in the 3.0L Hurricane engines of the 2025 Ram 1500 models. This defect is said to be in the engine control module and/or powertrain control module, potentially causing issues like check engine lights, drivability problems, and loss of power.

What are the dangers associated with this engine defect?

The lawsuit states that when the defect manifests, it can cause the Ram 1500 trucks to stall, hesitate, misfire, or lose power unexpectedly while driving, which poses a danger to the occupants and other vehicles on the road.

Who is represented in this lawsuit?

The plaintiffs are represented by E. Powell Miller and Dennis A. Lienhardt of The Miller Law Firm P.C., and Matthew D. Schelkopf and Joseph B. Kenney of Sauder Schelkopf LLC.

Related Cases

$15M Levoit Air Purifier Class Action Settlement — Product Liability class action lawsuit

$15M Levoit Air Purifier Class Action Settlement

Current
Product Liability
Vesync agreed to a $15 million settlement to resolve claims that it falsely advertised Levoit air purifiers as having "True HEPA" filters. The settlement applies to consumers who bought specific Levoit-branded air purifiers or replacement filters with certain filtration claims.
Video Game Addiction Lawsuit Investigation — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Video Game Addiction Lawsuit Investigation

Current
Product Liability
This investigation concerns allegations that certain video game companies designed their games with features intended to keep players engaged for long periods. Plaintiffs claim these design elements contributed to gaming addiction and related harms among minors and young adults.
GM Class Action Over Alleged Defective CVT Transmission in Chevy and GMC Models — Product Liability class action lawsuit

GM Class Action Over Alleged Defective CVT Transmission in Chevy and GMC Models

Current
Product Liability
A class action lawsuit has been filed alleging that General Motors knowingly sold vehicles equipped with a defective continuously variable transmission (CVT) in various Chevy and GMC models. The complaint claims this defect can cause significant safety issues, such as sudden power loss while driving. The lawsuit seeks to represent owners of specific models manufactured between 2019 and 2025.