Consumer Fraud

Revlon Class Action Lawsuits Over Mitchum Deodorant Fragrance Claims

Revlon Class Action Lawsuits Over Mitchum Deodorant Fragrance Claims — Consumer Fraud class action lawsuit

Case Overview

Four consumers filed two separate class action lawsuits against Revlon Consumer Products LLC. The plaintiffs contend that the company misrepresented its Mitchum antiperspirant and deodorant products by marketing them as

Who May Qualify

U.S. purchasers, with subclasses for California and New York, covering purchases made three to four years before the filing date.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the core allegation in these lawsuits?

The plaintiffs claim that Revlon falsely advertised its Mitchum products as

What evidence do the plaintiffs use to support their claims?

The complaints allege that the ingredient lists disclose

What legal claims are being brought?

The lawsuits generally plead violations of California and New York consumer protection statutes, breach of warranty, unjust enrichment, and fraud.

Related Cases

$9.37M Concora Credit TCPA Class Action Settlement — Consumer Fraud class action lawsuit

$9.37M Concora Credit TCPA Class Action Settlement

Current
Consumer Fraud
Concora Credit Inc. has agreed to a settlement to resolve allegations that it violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) by making calls using artificial or prerecorded voices without explicit consent.
CookUnity Class Action Over Misleading Emails — Consumer Fraud class action lawsuit

CookUnity Class Action Over Misleading Emails

Current
Consumer Fraud
A class action lawsuit alleges that the meal delivery service CookUnity sent commercial emails to consumers using misleading subject lines. The complaint claims these emails create a false sense of urgency to pressure people into making immediate purchases.
Allulose Lawsuits Over Sugar-Free Claims — Consumer Fraud class action lawsuit

Allulose Lawsuits Over Sugar-Free Claims

Current
Consumer Fraud
Multiple class action lawsuits have been filed alleging that several companies marketed products as sugar-free when they actually contained allulose as a sweetener. The lawsuits claim consumers were misled into paying a premium price based on false labeling.