Consumer Fraud

Samsung Smart TV Data Collection Lawsuit

Samsung Smart TV Data Collection Lawsuit — Consumer Fraud class action lawsuit

Case Overview

A group of consumers initiated a class action lawsuit against Samsung Electronics America Inc. The core allegation is that the company gathers and disseminates information regarding what users watch on their Samsung smart televisions without obtaining the necessary consent from those users.

The complaint specifically accuses Samsung of employing Automatic Content Recognition (ACR) technology for this surveillance, arguing that the company's design and consent procedures are misleading. The plaintiffs contend that Samsung has violated both state and federal laws by collecting user data without fully informed consent, and they are suing for invasion of privacy, negligence, unjust enrichment, and violations of privacy laws.

The lawsuit seeks to represent any individual in the United States whose Samsung smart TV has collected, analyzed, or transmitted viewing information, as well as those whose viewing data was linked to identity data. The plaintiffs are seeking damages, public injunctive relief, and an order to halt the alleged data collection practices.

,

Who May Qualify

Anyone in the United States whose Samsung smart TV has collected, analyzed, or transmitted viewing information, or whose viewing data was associated with identity data.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the basis of the lawsuit against Samsung?

The lawsuit alleges that Samsung collects and shares data about what consumers watch on their smart TVs without their consent. Plaintiffs claim this data is used to feed Samsung’s advertising business using Automatic Content Recognition (ACR) technology.

What types of damages are the plaintiffs seeking?

The plaintiffs are suing for damages, public injunctive relief, and an order that would stop the alleged data collection practices by Samsung.

Who is representing the plaintiffs in this case?

The plaintiffs are represented by Catherine E. Ybarra and Sonjay C. Singh of Siri & Glimstad LLP, and Andrew R. Tate of Privacy Rights Law LLC.

Related Cases

Debt Collection Lawsuit Investigation — Consumer Fraud class action lawsuit

Debt Collection Lawsuit Investigation

Current
Consumer Fraud
This investigation concerns potential violations of state consumer protection laws related to debt collection calls from various financial institutions. Consumers who have received excessive or unlawful calls may be able to participate in this investigation.
Teleflora Do Not Call Registry Class Action Settlement — Consumer Fraud class action lawsuit

Teleflora Do Not Call Registry Class Action Settlement

Current
Consumer Fraud
Teleflora agreed to a $6 million settlement to resolve allegations that it violated the federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act by sending unwanted text messages. The settlement applies to individuals who received multiple promotional texts from Teleflora despite not providing their number or consent, and whose number was registered with the National Do Not Call Registry.
Dove Body Wash False Advertising Allegations — Consumer Fraud class action lawsuit

Dove Body Wash False Advertising Allegations

Current
Consumer Fraud
A class action lawsuit alleges that Unilever misled consumers by falsely advertising the collagen content in its Dove Vitality Renewal Firming Body Wash. The suit claims the product contains only a plant-derived substitute, not genuine collagen.