Consumer Fraud

Skechers USA Toning Shoes False Advertising & Injury Class Action Settlement

Skechers USA Toning Shoes False Advertising & Injury Class Action Settlement — Consumer Fraud class action lawsuit

Case Overview

Skechers USA is facing renewed class action litigation alleging that the company's latest line of footwear—including 'Hands Free Slip-ins,' 'Arch Fit,' and 'GOrun' shoes—was marketed with deceptive health claims that were not supported by credible scientific evidence. Plaintiffs allege that Skechers claimed its shoes improve posture, reduce joint pain, strengthen muscles, and enhance athletic performance, claims the complaint argues are materially false and misleading. This is not the first time Skechers has faced such allegations: in 2012, the FTC and a multistate coalition secured a $50 million settlement over similar false advertising for the original Skechers 'Shape-ups' toning shoes. Plaintiffs contend the company has reverted to the same deceptive playbook under new product names and branding.

The 2023–2024 litigation alleges violations of multiple state consumer protection statutes and seeks refunds for consumers who paid a premium price for shoes based on the advertised health benefits. Plaintiffs argue that independent biomechanical testing found no statistically significant difference between Skechers' premium lines and comparably priced conventional sneakers. Some plaintiffs also allege physical injuries—including ankle sprains and falls—caused by the unstable rocker-bottom sole designs that Skechers marketed as beneficial for balance and core strengthening. The case is currently in the class certification phase.

Who May Qualify

U.S. consumers who purchased Skechers Hands Free Slip-ins, Shape-ups, Arch Fit, or other Skechers shoes marketed with toning, posture, or muscle-strengthening claims within the applicable statute of limitations period (generally 2019–present), and who paid a price premium based on those advertised benefits.

Frequently Asked Questions

Did Skechers settle a lawsuit over false advertising before?

Yes. In 2012, Skechers paid $50 million to settle FTC charges and a multistate class action over its original 'Shape-ups' toning shoes, which were marketed as helping consumers lose weight and tone muscles. The new 2023–2024 litigation alleges the company has continued similar deceptive practices with its newer product lines.

Can I get money back from Skechers for buying their shoes?

If the current class action results in a settlement, consumers who purchased qualifying Skechers shoe lines marketed with health or toning claims may be eligible for a partial refund. The case has not settled yet as of mid-2025; check back for updates on any claims process.

What Skechers shoes are involved in the lawsuit?

The current litigation focuses on Skechers 'Hands Free Slip-ins,' 'Arch Fit,' 'GOrun,' and other lines marketed with claims about posture improvement, muscle strengthening, joint pain relief, or enhanced athletic performance.

Related Cases

Google Location Data Privacy & Incognito Mode Tracking Antitrust & Consumer Fraud Class Action Settlement — Consumer Fraud class action lawsuit

Google Location Data Privacy & Incognito Mode Tracking Antitrust & Consumer Fraud Class Action Settlement

Past
Consumer Fraud
Google agreed to destroy billions of data records and pay hundreds of millions of dollars to settle class actions alleging it secretly tracked users' browsing activity even in Incognito mode and collected location data without meaningful consent, affecting hundreds of millions of Americans.
Celsius Holdings / CELSIUS Energy Drink False Advertising Class Action — Consumer Fraud class action lawsuit

Celsius Holdings / CELSIUS Energy Drink False Advertising Class Action

Current
Consumer Fraud
Consumers filed a class action against Celsius Holdings alleging its popular CELSIUS energy drinks were falsely marketed as containing 'no preservatives' when independent testing found the drinks contain citric acid, a substance widely used as a chemical preservative.
Generative AI Copyright Infringement Litigation – OpenAI & Microsoft (Authors Guild) — Consumer Fraud class action lawsuit

Generative AI Copyright Infringement Litigation – OpenAI & Microsoft (Authors Guild)

Current
Consumer Fraud
A landmark class action filed by the Authors Guild on behalf of thousands of novelists, journalists, and non-fiction writers alleges that OpenAI and Microsoft trained ChatGPT and related AI models on copyrighted books and articles without authorization or compensation.