Product Liability

Snap Inc. (Snapchat) Minor User Safety & Addiction Litigation

Snap Inc. (Snapchat) Minor User Safety & Addiction Litigation — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Case Overview

Thousands of families have filed suit against Snap Inc., the parent company of Snapchat, alleging that the platform was knowingly designed with addictive features—including disappearing messages, streaks, and a dopamine-triggering interface—that disproportionately harm minors. Plaintiffs claim Snap had internal research confirming the app's detrimental effects on youth mental health, including links to anxiety, depression, eating disorders, and suicidal ideation, yet continued to deploy these features without adequate safeguards or parental controls.

The litigation, consolidated in the Northern District of California as part of the broader Social Media Youth Harm MDL (MDL No. 3047), alleges product liability, negligence, and violations of consumer protection statutes. Several state attorneys general have filed parallel actions. As of 2025, the case is in active discovery, with plaintiffs pushing for internal communications and algorithmic design documents. No settlement has been reached, and bellwether trials are expected to be scheduled in 2026.

Who May Qualify

Parents or guardians of minors, or young adults who used Snapchat as minors, and who suffered documented mental health injuries—such as depression, anxiety, self-harm, or eating disorders—allegedly linked to addictive use of the platform.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I sue Snapchat if my child was harmed by using the app?

Yes, you may be eligible to join the litigation if your minor child suffered documented psychological harm—such as depression, anxiety, or self-harm—that you believe is linked to addictive use of Snapchat. You should consult with an attorney to evaluate your specific situation.

Is the Snapchat lawsuit part of the broader social media harm MDL?

Yes. The Snap cases are consolidated within MDL No. 3047 in the Northern District of California, which also includes cases against Meta, TikTok, and YouTube. The MDL is designed to streamline pretrial proceedings across thousands of related cases.

What damages are plaintiffs seeking in the Snapchat minor safety lawsuit?

Plaintiffs are seeking compensatory damages for medical and psychiatric treatment costs, pain and suffering, and in wrongful death cases, damages for the loss of a child. Punitive damages are also sought based on allegations that Snap knowingly concealed the harms of its platform.

Related Cases

Depo-Provera (Medroxyprogesterone) Brain Tumor (Meningioma) lawsuit — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Depo-Provera (Medroxyprogesterone) Brain Tumor (Meningioma) lawsuit

Current
Product Liability
Women who received long-term Depo-Provera (injectable contraceptive) injections are suing Pfizer, alleging the drug significantly increases the risk of developing meningioma brain tumors and that the company failed to warn patients and physicians of this risk despite knowing about it for years.
Jeep Windshield Defect Class Action Lawsuit — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Jeep Windshield Defect Class Action Lawsuit

Current
Product Liability
Jeep drivers are participating in a class action lawsuit against the windshield manufacturer, Fuyao Glass America Inc., alleging that the windshields used in certain Jeep models have a defect that causes them to crack easily.
Gerber and Baby Food Makers Autism MDL Partial Summary Judgment — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Gerber and Baby Food Makers Autism MDL Partial Summary Judgment

Current
Product Liability
Baby food manufacturers, including Gerber, have won a partial summary judgment in a multidistrict litigation concerning claims that heavy metals in their products caused autism or ADHD in children.