Styrofoam / Polystyrene Food Container Environmental & Consumer Class Action
Case Overview
Dart Container Corporation manufactures the ubiquitous white foam (expanded polystyrene, or EPS) cups, plates, and clamshell food containers sold under the Solo and Dart brands across the United States. Despite Dart's long-running marketing campaigns promoting its products as 'recyclable,' plaintiffs allege that the practical reality is that virtually no U.S. municipal recycling programs accept polystyrene foam, and the material routinely breaks into microplastic particles that contaminate waterways, soil, and marine ecosystems. California banned single-use polystyrene food containers in 2022 under SB 54, and dozens of other cities and counties have enacted similar bans, underscoring the material's acknowledged environmental harm.
The lawsuits, brought under California's Unfair Competition Law (UCL) and Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA) as well as environmental nuisance theories, allege that Dart's 'recyclable' claims constitute deceptive advertising and that the company must bear a portion of the cleanup costs imposed on municipalities and the public. Related public nuisance actions filed by California municipalities seek to hold Dart liable for storm-drain and beach cleanup expenses. Dart denies the allegations and maintains it operates legitimate recycling programs. The litigation is at early stages, with Dart having filed motions to dismiss the consumer fraud claims. Environmental advocates see this case as a test of corporate accountability for plastic pollution greenwashing.
Who May Qualify
California consumers who purchased single-use expanded polystyrene (EPS/foam) food containers, cups, or plates manufactured by Dart Container Corporation (sold under brands including Solo and Dart) between approximately 2018 and the present, in reliance on recyclability claims. Municipal plaintiffs include California cities and counties that incurred foam-litter cleanup costs.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Dart Container being sued for calling Styrofoam recyclable?
Yes. Lawsuits allege that Dart Container misled consumers by marketing its polystyrene foam products as recyclable when virtually no U.S. municipal programs actually accept the material, constituting false advertising under California consumer protection law.
Are Styrofoam cups and containers recyclable?
In practice, very few municipal recycling programs in the United States accept expanded polystyrene (EPS) foam. While the material technically can be recycled in specialized facilities, the infrastructure is not widely available, which is central to the deceptive-advertising claims in this litigation.
Can I join the Dart Container environmental lawsuit?
The case is still in early litigation stages and no settlement or class certification has been reached yet. California consumers who purchased Dart/Solo foam products may potentially qualify for the class. Check back for updates as the case develops.
Related Cases
$75M Northrop Grumman Soil Contamination Class Action Settlement
DuPont, Chemours, Corteva PFAS Settlement with North Carolina