Product Liability

Tesla Full Self-Driving Class Action Lawsuit

Tesla Full Self-Driving Class Action Lawsuit — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Case Overview

Tesla owners and lessees have initiated a class action lawsuit alleging that the company misrepresented the self-driving capabilities of certain models. The core issue is that Tesla marketed vehicles as possessing all the necessary hardware for fully autonomous driving, leading consumers to pay thousands of dollars for the Full Self-Driving (FSD) package or related features.

The lawsuit claims that while Tesla promoted these vehicles as FSD-ready, achieving these capabilities may necessitate significant hardware replacements, such as new computers and cameras, and that the vehicles have not actually achieved unsupervised, fully autonomous driving. The claims center on the alleged discrepancy between Tesla's advertising promises and the actual, unachieved functionality of the vehicles.

Attorneys are actively investigating claims from Tesla owners nationwide, with the lawsuit filed in June 2026. Individuals who purchased or leased a Tesla equipped with Hardware 2, 2.5, or 3 between 2016 and 2023, and who paid for the FSD package, may qualify. To determine eligibility, affected people are advised to fill out the form provided on the source page.

Who May Qualify

Owners or lessees who purchased or leased a Tesla vehicle equipped with Hardware 2, Hardware 2.5, or Hardware 3, and who purchased the Full Self-Driving package or FSD Capability feature between 2016 and 2023, provided the vehicle has not achieved unsupervised or fully autonomous driving.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who can join the Tesla FSD class action lawsuit?

You may qualify if you purchased or leased a Tesla vehicle with Hardware 2, 2.5, or 3, and if you bought the Full Self-Driving package or FSD Capability feature between 2016 and 2023, and if your vehicle has not achieved fully autonomous driving.

What is the main allegation in the lawsuit?

The lawsuit alleges that Tesla misled consumers by marketing certain vehicles as having all the hardware required for fully autonomous driving, when in reality, these vehicles may require substantial hardware upgrades or replacements to achieve those advertised capabilities.

Related Cases

GM Class Action Over Faulty Brakes in 2025 Models — Product Liability class action lawsuit

GM Class Action Over Faulty Brakes in 2025 Models

Current
Product Liability
A class action lawsuit has been filed against General Motors concerning alleged defects in the brake systems of several 2025 models. The plaintiffs claim that the faulty brakes can lead to a complete or partial loss of braking ability, posing a significant safety risk to drivers.
Jeep Hybrid SUV Misrepresentation Lawsuit — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Jeep Hybrid SUV Misrepresentation Lawsuit

Current
Product Liability
A group of Jeep owners filed a class action lawsuit alleging that FCA misrepresented the safety and reliability of their hybrid SUVs, specifically the Wrangler 4xe and Grand Cherokee 4xe. The lawsuit claims that FCA failed to properly disclose and repair significant defects in these vehicles, despite marketing them as safe and dependable. The plaintiffs allege that their reliance on FCA's representations led them to purchase or lease the vehicles, and they are seeking damages related to these alleged misrepresentations.
Graco Baby Swing Defect Class Action — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Graco Baby Swing Defect Class Action

Current
Product Liability
A class action lawsuit alleges that Graco's Slim Spaces Compact Baby Swing has a defect causing it to accelerate to dangerous speeds. The complaint claims this defect poses a serious risk of physical harm or death to infants.