Product Liability

Uber Sexual Assault MDL Settlement

Uber Sexual Assault MDL Settlement — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Case Overview

The settlement involves Uber Technologies Inc. following allegations of sexual assault by a driver. Specifically, the case concerns a Texas woman, identified as Jane Doe, who alleged that an Uber driver sexually assaulted her during a ride in Tarrant County, Texas, on June 9, 2020.

The claims alleged that the driver committed the assault and that Uber failed in its background check procedures, allowing a dangerous individual onto the platform. Furthermore, the litigation alleges that Uber was aware as early as 2014 that its drivers were sexually assaulting passengers and that the company failed to implement necessary safety measures, such as enhanced background checks and cameras.

The terms of the settlement are confidential. The lawsuit was part of the Uber multidistrict litigation (MDL), which encompasses approximately 5,000 other cases. For those affected, the content advises that legal options may exist, including a confidential case review.

Who May Qualify

Individuals who were or whose loved ones were sexually assaulted by an Uber or Lyft driver.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Uber MDL?

The Uber MDL is a multidistrict litigation that groups together similar federal cases related to alleged sexual assaults by Uber drivers. This MDL currently involves approximately 5,000 other cases awaiting resolution.

What were the allegations against Uber?

The allegations suggest that Uber knew as far back as 2014 that its drivers were sexually assaulting passengers and that the company failed to implement adequate safety measures, such as enhanced background checks and cameras.

What happened in the recent trial?

The third bellwether trial in the Uber sexual assault MDL ended in a settlement. This occurred after the plaintiff's attorneys announced the settlement on October 2, less than two days after a jury was selected.

Related Cases

Jeep Hybrid SUV Misrepresentation Lawsuit — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Jeep Hybrid SUV Misrepresentation Lawsuit

Current
Product Liability
A group of Jeep owners filed a class action lawsuit alleging that FCA misrepresented the safety and reliability of their hybrid SUVs, specifically the Wrangler 4xe and Grand Cherokee 4xe. The lawsuit claims that FCA failed to properly disclose and repair significant defects in these vehicles, despite marketing them as safe and dependable. The plaintiffs allege that their reliance on FCA's representations led them to purchase or lease the vehicles, and they are seeking damages related to these alleged misrepresentations.
Graco Baby Swing Defect Class Action — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Graco Baby Swing Defect Class Action

Current
Product Liability
A class action lawsuit alleges that Graco's Slim Spaces Compact Baby Swing has a defect causing it to accelerate to dangerous speeds. The complaint claims this defect poses a serious risk of physical harm or death to infants.
Bell & Howell PFAS Cookware Class Action Settlement — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Bell & Howell PFAS Cookware Class Action Settlement

Past
Product Liability
This settlement addresses claims that cookware products from brands like Gotham Steel, Granite Stone, and Bell & Howell were falsely advertised as safe and non-toxic despite containing dangerous chemicals.