Environmental

Aqueous Film-Forming Foams (AFFF) Products Liability Litigation

Aqueous Film-Forming Foams (AFFF) Products Liability Litigation — Environmental class action lawsuit

Case Overview

This massive and complex multidistrict litigation (MDL) targets chemical manufacturers like 3M and DuPont over the contamination of water sources with per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), often called "forever chemicals." The primary product at issue is Aqueous Film-Forming Foam (AFFF), a highly effective fire suppressant used for decades at airports and military bases.

The lawsuits, brought by water municipalities, state attorneys general, and individuals, allege that these companies knew for decades that PFAS chemicals were toxic, persistent in the environment, and could accumulate in human blood, yet they continued to produce and sell them without adequate warnings. The health risks associated with PFAS exposure cited in the litigation include kidney cancer, testicular cancer, thyroid disease, and other serious conditions. The litigation seeks to recover the colossal costs of cleaning up contaminated water supplies and to compensate individuals for health problems linked to exposure.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I sue for water contamination from AFFF firefighting foam?

Yes, if you've been exposed to PFAS-contaminated water from aqueous film-forming foams used by firefighters, military, or airports, you may be eligible to join the AFFF products liability litigation against 3M, DuPont, and other manufacturers. The multidistrict litigation covers claims related to the "forever chemicals" that contaminated groundwater and drinking water supplies.

How do I get compensation from the AFFF settlement?

To claim settlement money, you must submit a claim form demonstrating your exposure to PFAS-contaminated water and any resulting medical or property damages. The settlement process varies depending on the specific AFFF settlement you're eligible for—you'll need to provide documentation of the contamination and your losses.

Is there a class action lawsuit against 3M and DuPont for PFAS water contamination?

Yes, there is active multidistrict litigation (MDL) consolidating AFFF-related claims against 3M, DuPont, and other defendants. The litigation addresses water contamination from their aqueous film-forming foam products containing PFAS chemicals that don't break down in the environment.

Related Cases

3M / Aearo Technologies Earplug PFAS Contamination Water Utility Lawsuit — Environmental class action lawsuit

3M / Aearo Technologies Earplug PFAS Contamination Water Utility Lawsuit

Current
Environmental
Hundreds of water utilities and municipalities across the United States are suing 3M, alleging the company's manufacture and sale of PFAS-containing products (including firefighting foams and consumer goods) contaminated drinking water supplies, forcing utilities to spend billions on testing and remediation.
Styrofoam / Polystyrene Food Container Environmental & Consumer Class Action — Environmental class action lawsuit

Styrofoam / Polystyrene Food Container Environmental & Consumer Class Action

Current
Environmental
Environmental and consumer advocacy groups, along with individual plaintiffs, have filed suit against Dart Container Corporation — the world's largest maker of single-use foam cups and containers — alleging that the company misled consumers about the recyclability of its polystyrene products and is responsible for widespread environmental contamination from foam litter.
NPE/PFAS 'Forever Chemicals' Drinking Water Contamination Litigation — Environmental class action lawsuit

NPE/PFAS 'Forever Chemicals' Drinking Water Contamination Litigation

Current
Environmental
Thousands of public water systems across the U.S. sued 3M, DuPont, and other manufacturers after PFAS 'forever chemicals' contaminated drinking water supplies nationwide. 3M agreed to pay up to $12.5 billion and DuPont-related entities agreed to pay $1.185 billion to resolve claims.