Product Liability

Roblox and Fortnite Lawsuit Over Addictive Design

Roblox and Fortnite Lawsuit Over Addictive Design — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Case Overview

A Florida resident filed a lawsuit against Roblox Corporation and Epic Games Inc., alleging that their video game products were engineered with features that promote prolonged and addictive gameplay among minors. The plaintiff stated that his own use of these games became increasingly compulsive and uncontrollable, leading to various personal difficulties.

The lawsuit claims that both companies were aware of research regarding video game addiction and that features such as achievement systems, season passes, and microtransactions utilized psychological techniques, like operant conditioning, to maximize playtime and spending. The legal claims asserted include strict product liability, negligence, intentional and negligent misrepresentation, fraud, and violations of California’s Unfair Competition Law.

The lawsuit is currently filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. Affected individuals who believe their child suffered harm linked to excessive use of these games may consider consulting with an attorney, as the plaintiff was represented by Kiley Lynn Grombacher of Bradley Grombacher LLP and Bryan Aylstock of Aylstock Witkin Kreis & Overholtz PLC.

Who May Qualify

Individuals whose children experienced serious harm potentially linked to addiction from Roblox or Fortnite.

Frequently Asked Questions

What specific issues are alleged regarding the games?

The lawsuit alleges that the games were designed with features like achievement systems, season passes, and microtransactions that use psychological techniques to encourage continuous play. These features are claimed to promote addictive and prolonged use among minors.

What types of damages are being sought?

The plaintiff is seeking various remedies, including monetary damages, punitive damages, reimbursement for attorneys’ fees, and injunctive relief.

Who is representing the plaintiff in this case?

The plaintiff is represented by Kiley Lynn Grombacher of Bradley Grombacher LLP and Bryan Aylstock of Aylstock Witkin Kreis & Overholtz PLC.

Related Cases

$15M Levoit Air Purifier Class Action Settlement — Product Liability class action lawsuit

$15M Levoit Air Purifier Class Action Settlement

Current
Product Liability
Vesync agreed to a $15 million settlement to resolve claims that it falsely advertised Levoit air purifiers as having "True HEPA" filters. The settlement applies to consumers who bought specific Levoit-branded air purifiers or replacement filters with certain filtration claims.
Video Game Addiction Lawsuit Investigation — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Video Game Addiction Lawsuit Investigation

Current
Product Liability
This investigation concerns allegations that certain video game companies designed their games with features intended to keep players engaged for long periods. Plaintiffs claim these design elements contributed to gaming addiction and related harms among minors and young adults.
Ram 2025 Trucks Dangerous Engine Defect Class Action — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Ram 2025 Trucks Dangerous Engine Defect Class Action

Current
Product Liability
Two truck owners filed a class action lawsuit against FCA US LLC, alleging that 2025 model year Ram 1500 trucks have a dangerous engine defect. The lawsuit claims the automaker failed to disclose this defect, which can cause sudden power loss while driving.