Product Liability

Roblox and Fortnite Lawsuit Over Addictive Design

Roblox and Fortnite Lawsuit Over Addictive Design — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Case Overview

A Florida resident filed a lawsuit against Roblox Corporation and Epic Games Inc., alleging that their video game products were engineered with features that promote prolonged and addictive gameplay among minors. The plaintiff stated that his own use of these games became increasingly compulsive and uncontrollable, leading to various personal difficulties.

The lawsuit claims that both companies were aware of research regarding video game addiction and that features such as achievement systems, season passes, and microtransactions utilized psychological techniques, like operant conditioning, to maximize playtime and spending. The legal claims asserted include strict product liability, negligence, intentional and negligent misrepresentation, fraud, and violations of California’s Unfair Competition Law.

The lawsuit is currently filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. Affected individuals who believe their child suffered harm linked to excessive use of these games may consider consulting with an attorney, as the plaintiff was represented by Kiley Lynn Grombacher of Bradley Grombacher LLP and Bryan Aylstock of Aylstock Witkin Kreis & Overholtz PLC.

Who May Qualify

Individuals whose children experienced serious harm potentially linked to addiction from Roblox or Fortnite.

Frequently Asked Questions

What specific issues are alleged regarding the games?

The lawsuit alleges that the games were designed with features like achievement systems, season passes, and microtransactions that use psychological techniques to encourage continuous play. These features are claimed to promote addictive and prolonged use among minors.

What types of damages are being sought?

The plaintiff is seeking various remedies, including monetary damages, punitive damages, reimbursement for attorneys’ fees, and injunctive relief.

Who is representing the plaintiff in this case?

The plaintiff is represented by Kiley Lynn Grombacher of Bradley Grombacher LLP and Bryan Aylstock of Aylstock Witkin Kreis & Overholtz PLC.

Related Cases

Mead Johnson Infant Formula NEC Lawsuit — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Mead Johnson Infant Formula NEC Lawsuit

Past
Product Liability
A jury in Illinois rejected claims that Mead Johnson's infant formula caused a premature baby to develop necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). The lawsuit alleges the company failed to warn about the risks associated with its product.
$110M Transamerica Life Insurance Class Action Settlement — Product Liability class action lawsuit

$110M Transamerica Life Insurance Class Action Settlement

Past
Product Liability
Transamerica Life Insurance agreed to a $110 million settlement to resolve claims regarding its failure to properly credit certain cash value increases on specific life insurance policies. The settlement applies to policyholders who owned or owned a universal life insurance policy that was active on January 1, 2016, and was identified by certain product names or attribute codes.
Clorox Contaminated Cleaner Class Action — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Clorox Contaminated Cleaner Class Action

Current
Product Liability
A class action lawsuit alleges that The Clorox Company sold scented cleaning products, such as Mistolin and Lestoil, that were potentially contaminated with the bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The plaintiffs claim the company failed to warn consumers about this danger, especially for those with weakened immune systems.