Product Liability

Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit

Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Case Overview

p

A woman named Kim Doherty filed a lawsuit against Abbott Laboratories and Advanced Neuromodulation Systems Inc., also known as Abbott Medical. Doherty alleges that the company's spinal cord stimulation (SCS) devices, which include systems like Proclaim XR, Proclaim, Eterna, and FlexBurst360, have defective leads and implantable pulse generators (IPGs) that can fail. These failures allegedly cause worsening pain, neurological injuries, and other health complications.

The core allegations center on the devices' electrical leads and IPGs having an unacceptably high failure rate. The complaint specifies potential issues such as lead fractures, insulation breaches, lead migration, and IPG or battery malfunctions, which can interrupt therapy and cause uncontrolled electrical stimulation, burns, and permanent nerve damage. The lawsuit asserts claims for strict liability based on manufacturing and design defects, failure to warn, and corporate negligence.

Doherty was implanted with an Abbott SCS device in April 2019 and began experiencing worsening symptoms in 2020. The lawsuit seeks compensatory and punitive damages, attorneys’ fees, and other relief. For more information, the complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

Who May Qualify

Individuals who experienced complications or injuries after receiving an SCS device from Abbott.

Frequently Asked Questions

What types of devices are involved in the lawsuit?

The lawsuit concerns Abbott's spinal cord stimulation (SCS) systems, including models such as Proclaim XR, Proclaim, Eterna, and FlexBurst360. These devices are designed to deliver electrical stimulation to the spinal cord to treat chronic pain.

What specific failures are alleged regarding the devices?

The allegations include issues with the electrical leads and implantable pulse generators (IPGs). Specific failures cited are lead fractures, insulation breaches, lead migration, and malfunctions of the IPG or battery, which can interrupt therapy.

What legal claims are being asserted by the plaintiff?

The plaintiff asserts multiple claims, including strict liability based on manufacturing and design defects, failure to warn, corporate negligence, and fraudulent misrepresentation. She is seeking compensatory and punitive damages.

Related Cases

Roblox Addiction Lawsuit Investigation — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Roblox Addiction Lawsuit Investigation

Current
Product Liability
Attorneys are investigating claims that Roblox was designed to encourage compulsive play, leading to addiction and various harms in children. Parents of affected children may be able to pursue legal action.
Chrysler Jeep Grand Cherokee Coil Spring Recall and Related Lawsuit — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Chrysler Jeep Grand Cherokee Coil Spring Recall and Related Lawsuit

Current
Product Liability
Chrysler is recalling multiple Jeep Grand Cherokee models due to a defect in the rear coil springs. Separately, Chrysler is facing a class action lawsuit alleging misrepresentation regarding the safety of certain Jeep models.
GM Sierra, Silverado Transmission Defect Class Action — Product Liability class action lawsuit

GM Sierra, Silverado Transmission Defect Class Action

Current
Product Liability
A class action lawsuit alleges that General Motors sold pickup trucks equipped with a defective transmission and concealed the problem from consumers for years. The suit covers specific GMC and Chevrolet models from the 2019 model year onward.