Product Liability

McDonald's Hot McCrispy Chicken Sandwich Burn Injury Class Action

McDonald's Hot McCrispy Chicken Sandwich Burn Injury Class Action — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Case Overview

A class action filed in early 2024 alleges that McDonald's McCrispy chicken sandwiches are systematically served at temperatures far exceeding safe food-serving standards, posing a burn hazard to unsuspecting customers. Named plaintiffs describe suffering serious burns to the mouth, tongue, throat, and fingers upon biting into or handling the sandwiches, claiming the chicken was heated to temperatures well above what a reasonable consumer would expect from a fast-food menu item. The complaint draws parallels to the landmark 1994 Liebeck v. McDonald's hot coffee case, arguing that McDonald's is aware of the overheating problem yet has done nothing to address it or warn customers.

The plaintiffs allege claims of negligence, strict products liability, breach of implied warranty of merchantability, and violations of consumer protection statutes. The lawsuit seeks to certify a nationwide class of consumers who purchased McCrispy sandwiches and suffered burn injuries, as well as injunctive relief requiring McDonald's to modify its preparation procedures or add prominent temperature warnings. McDonald's has not publicly commented on the litigation in detail. The case reflects a growing wave of food-temperature burn injury litigation targeting quick-service restaurant chains across the United States.

Who May Qualify

U.S. consumers who purchased a McDonald's McCrispy chicken sandwich and suffered burn injuries to the mouth, throat, hands, or other body parts as a result of the sandwich being served at an excessively high temperature.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I sue McDonald's if their food burned me?

Yes, if you suffered a burn injury from a McDonald's McCrispy sandwich or other food item served at an unsafe temperature, you may have a product liability or negligence claim. A class action is currently pending in federal court in Illinois, and consulting a personal injury attorney is advisable.

How hot are McDonald's McCrispy sandwiches being served?

Plaintiffs allege the sandwiches are served at temperatures significantly above safe food-service standards. While McDonald's has not disclosed its precise serving temperature targets, the lawsuit claims some sandwiches were measured at temperatures capable of causing immediate burns on contact.

Is the McDonald's hot food lawsuit similar to the famous hot coffee case?

Plaintiffs draw a direct comparison to the 1994 Liebeck case, in which a jury awarded damages after a McDonald's customer suffered third-degree burns from excessively hot coffee. Both cases allege McDonald's knowingly serves food or beverages at dangerous temperatures without adequate warnings.

Related Cases

Victoza (Liraglutide) Lawsuit: Vision Loss (NAION) Claims — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Victoza (Liraglutide) Lawsuit: Vision Loss (NAION) Claims

Current
Product Liability
Victoza (liraglutide) lawsuits claim that Novo Nordisk failed to warn patients about the risk of non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION), a condition causing sudden vision loss. Users of the GLP-1 diabetes drug allege that the manufacturer did not adequately disclose the potential eye damage risks.
B. Braun Aesculap Knee Replacement Defective Device Lawsuit — Product Liability class action lawsuit

B. Braun Aesculap Knee Replacement Defective Device Lawsuit

Current
Product Liability
A lawsuit against B. Braun alleges that its Aesculap knee replacement devices have serious design defects causing metallosis, early device failure, and complications requiring revision surgeries. The company is accused of concealing these defects from regulators while continuing to promote the device.
Saxenda Lawsuit — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Saxenda Lawsuit

Current
Product Liability
Saxenda (liraglutide), a weight-loss drug approved by the FDA in 2014, is subject to ongoing litigation over alleged inadequate warnings about serious side effects including pancreatic cancer, pancreatitis, thyroid cancer, and stomach paralysis. Novo Nordisk is being sued for failing to warn patients of these health risks associated with the drug.