Product Liability

Saxenda Lawsuit

Saxenda Lawsuit — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Case Overview

Saxenda is an injectable weight-loss medication containing liraglutide that was approved by the FDA on December 23, 2014, and manufactured by Novo Nordisk, a Danish multinational pharmaceutical company. The drug is prescribed in conjunction with diet and exercise for obese and overweight adults. Recent studies have found that Saxenda may increase the risk of serious health conditions including pancreatitis, pancreatic cancer, thyroid cancer, and stomach paralysis (gastroparesis).

Lawsuits against Novo Nordisk allege that the company failed to adequately warn patients about possible risks of severe stomach problems, pancreatic cancer, and other serious complications. One notable case is Jaclyn Bjorklund v. Novo Nordisk et al., where a 44-year-old woman from Louisiana claims she was severely injured after taking the drug, developing stomach problems so severe that she required emergency room visits multiple times and experienced severe vomiting that resulted in tooth loss. Currently, individual lawsuits are being filed on behalf of people who developed pancreatic cancer or pre-cancerous cell changes after taking Saxenda, with no class action lawsuits filed as of the date of this information. About 400 individuals have reported gastrointestinal injuries allegedly caused by diabetes and weight-loss drugs in this class.

Who May Qualify

You may qualify for a Saxenda lawsuit if you: were diagnosed with pancreatic cancer or pre-cancerous cell changes after taking Saxenda; developed severe stomach paralysis (gastroparesis) after using the drug; experienced other serious side effects such as acute pancreatitis or thyroid cancer; have medical records linking your condition to Saxenda use; or incurred financial or physical harm due to these side effects. Currently, lawyers are primarily filing lawsuits on behalf of individuals who developed pancreatic cancer or pre-cancerous cell changes.

Frequently Asked Questions

What legal actions can I take against Novo Nordisk?

You can file individual lawsuits against Novo Nordisk for damages related to serious side effects from Saxenda. Currently, no class action lawsuits have been filed in the Saxenda litigation, as the drug was only recently approved and health risks are now beginning to surface.

Do I need proof that Saxenda caused my harm?

Yes, you need evidence demonstrating that Saxenda caused harm. Acceptable evidence includes medical records showing your health issues, purchase receipts, laboratory test results, expert testimony, and documentation of any communication with healthcare providers or the manufacturer.

What compensation can I receive from a Saxenda lawsuit?

You may be entitled to compensation covering all current and future medical expenses related to treatment of your condition, lost wages due to inability to work, pain and suffering, and other damages related to side effects caused by Saxenda.

Related Cases

Depo-Provera (Medroxyprogesterone) Brain Tumor (Meningioma) lawsuit — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Depo-Provera (Medroxyprogesterone) Brain Tumor (Meningioma) lawsuit

Current
Product Liability
Women who received long-term Depo-Provera (injectable contraceptive) injections are suing Pfizer, alleging the drug significantly increases the risk of developing meningioma brain tumors and that the company failed to warn patients and physicians of this risk despite knowing about it for years.
Jeep Windshield Defect Class Action Lawsuit — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Jeep Windshield Defect Class Action Lawsuit

Current
Product Liability
Jeep drivers are participating in a class action lawsuit against the windshield manufacturer, Fuyao Glass America Inc., alleging that the windshields used in certain Jeep models have a defect that causes them to crack easily.
Gerber and Baby Food Makers Autism MDL Partial Summary Judgment — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Gerber and Baby Food Makers Autism MDL Partial Summary Judgment

Current
Product Liability
Baby food manufacturers, including Gerber, have won a partial summary judgment in a multidistrict litigation concerning claims that heavy metals in their products caused autism or ADHD in children.