Consumer Fraud

Starbucks Sugar-Free Protein Beverage Class Action

Starbucks Sugar-Free Protein Beverage Class Action — Consumer Fraud class action lawsuit

Case Overview

Three consumers initiated a class action lawsuit against Starbucks Corp., alleging that the company marketed and sold eight different protein beverages under the "Sugar-Free" designation. The plaintiffs contend that these drinks contain substantial amounts of sugar, which they argue originates from lactose found naturally in milk, which is listed as an early ingredient in every beverage.

The core of the legal challenge revolves around U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations, which dictate that a beverage can only be labeled "sugar-free" if it contains less than 0.5 grams of sugar per customary reference amount. The plaintiffs assert that consumers would reasonably assume a "Sugar-Free" product contains no sugar, making the inclusion of 13 to 21 grams of sugar per serving misleading. Furthermore, the lawsuit claims Starbucks omitted an FDA-required calorie disclaimer, especially since consumers might assume "sugar-free" drinks are low in calories.

The plaintiffs seek to represent a nationwide class of all individuals who purchased these drinks for personal or household use from the product's launch until class certification. The company maintains that the claims lack merit and intends to defend itself vigorously. The lawsuit demands a jury trial and seeks restitution and damages, while the plaintiffs' attorneys are represented by Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP and Sterlington PLLC.

Who May Qualify

All persons in the United States who purchased one or more of the specified Starbucks protein drinks for personal, family, or household use from launch through the date of class certification.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main allegation against Starbucks?

The lawsuit claims that Starbucks marketed several protein beverages as "Sugar-Free" when they actually contain significant amounts of sugar, such as 13 to 21 grams per serving. The plaintiffs argue this misleads consumers who expect no sugar in such products.

What other issues are raised in the lawsuit?

In addition to the sugar content, the lawsuit alleges that Starbucks failed to include an FDA-required calorie disclaimer on the drinks, which the plaintiffs argue is necessary because consumers might assume "sugar-free" items are low in calories.

What is the current status of the lawsuit?

The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington, and the company has stated it will "vigorously defend" itself against the claims.

Related Cases

Walmart Great Value Shrimp Underweight Class Action — Consumer Fraud class action lawsuit

Walmart Great Value Shrimp Underweight Class Action

Current
Consumer Fraud
A class action lawsuit alleges that Walmart sold Great Value shrimp products that were underweight, causing consumers to pay for product that contained less seafood than advertised. The suit also claims that the products were coated with an ice glaze that affected the stated net weight.
California Fashion Retailers TCPA Class Action Lawsuits — Consumer Fraud class action lawsuit

California Fashion Retailers TCPA Class Action Lawsuits

Current
Consumer Fraud
Four separate class action lawsuits were filed against major fashion retailers alleging violations of telemarketing rules through text messages.
Royal Caribbean Misleading Promotional Emails Class Action — Consumer Fraud class action lawsuit

Royal Caribbean Misleading Promotional Emails Class Action

Current
Consumer Fraud
A class action lawsuit alleges that Royal Caribbean sent promotional emails to consumers in Maryland containing misleading information about cruise promotions. The complaint specifically claims the emails falsely suggested that certain offers were expiring when they had actually been extended.