Consumer Fraud

Walmart Great Value Shrimp Underweight Class Action

Walmart Great Value Shrimp Underweight Class Action — Consumer Fraud class action lawsuit

Case Overview

A class action lawsuit was filed by Elijah Baptist against Walmart Inc. The core allegation is that Walmart sold Great Value shrimp products that contained less actual shrimp than what was indicated on the packaging. The plaintiff claims that customers were effectively paying for ice glaze rather than the promised amount of seafood.

The lawsuit alleges that the Great Value shrimp products are coated with an ice glaze for preservation, but that the weight of this glaze cannot be included in the product's net weight according to U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines. Baptist asserts that the products weigh less than the stated amount once they are thawed and drained, constituting an unfair, deceptive, and/or fraudulent business practice and a breach of both express and implied warranties under state consumer laws.

The lawsuit seeks to represent all Illinois consumers who purchased the affected Great Value shrimp products. The plaintiff is demanding a jury trial and is requesting damages, restitution, and injunctive relief. The case was filed in Illinois state court, and the plaintiff is represented by Gary Klinger and Alexander Wolf of Milberg PLLC and Daniel O. Herrera and Alex Lee of Cafferty Clobes Meriwether & Sprengel LLP.

Who May Qualify

Illinois consumers who purchased Walmart's Great Value shrimp products.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the basis of the lawsuit against Walmart?

The lawsuit alleges that Walmart sold Great Value shrimp that were underweight, meaning the products contained less actual shrimp than what was stated on the packaging. Additionally, the suit claims the product's weight was misrepresented due to an ice glaze coating.

What laws are allegedly violated by Walmart?

The plaintiff alleges that Walmart's actions violate state consumer laws, specifically citing that the failure to provide the stated amount of frozen shrimp constitutes an unfair, deceptive, and/or fraudulent business practice and a breach of express and implied warranties.

Related Cases

Starbucks Sugar-Free Protein Beverage Class Action — Consumer Fraud class action lawsuit

Starbucks Sugar-Free Protein Beverage Class Action

Current
Consumer Fraud
A class action lawsuit alleges that Starbucks marketed several protein beverages as "Sugar-Free" despite containing significant amounts of sugar. The plaintiffs also claim the company failed to include required calorie disclaimers on these products.
California Fashion Retailers TCPA Class Action Lawsuits — Consumer Fraud class action lawsuit

California Fashion Retailers TCPA Class Action Lawsuits

Current
Consumer Fraud
Four separate class action lawsuits were filed against major fashion retailers alleging violations of telemarketing rules through text messages.
Royal Caribbean Misleading Promotional Emails Class Action — Consumer Fraud class action lawsuit

Royal Caribbean Misleading Promotional Emails Class Action

Current
Consumer Fraud
A class action lawsuit alleges that Royal Caribbean sent promotional emails to consumers in Maryland containing misleading information about cruise promotions. The complaint specifically claims the emails falsely suggested that certain offers were expiring when they had actually been extended.