Taste of the Wild Grain-Free Dog Food Heart Disease Lawsuit
Case Overview
Two New York pet owners initiated this class action lawsuit against Schell & Kampeter Inc., which operates as Diamond Pet Foods and markets Taste of the Wild. The plaintiffs contend that the company falsely promotes its grain-free dog food as a beneficial and safe option for pets.
The core allegations are that the dog food increases the risk of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), a serious heart ailment in dogs. The plaintiffs argue that the companies violated New York's consumer protection laws by allegedly ignoring scientific studies, warnings from veterinarians, and even the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) investigation into the link between grain-free diets and DCM, while also fraudulently concealing this information.
The lawsuit seeks a jury trial and demands various forms of damages for all class members who purchased the food in the last three years. The content does not specify a current claims deadline or settlement terms, advising interested parties to consult with an attorney.
Who May Qualify
New York consumers who purchased Taste of the Wild grain-free dog food within the past three years.
Frequently Asked Questions
What specific health risk is alleged regarding the dog food?
The plaintiffs allege that the Taste of the Wild grain-free dog food increases the risk of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), which is described as a potentially fatal heart disease in dogs.
What laws do the plaintiffs claim were violated?
The lawsuit claims violations of New York's consumer protection laws and alleges that the manufacturer misrepresented and concealed information about its products, constituting unjust enrichment and violating New York General Business Law.
Related Cases
Mead Johnson Infant Formula NEC Lawsuit
$110M Transamerica Life Insurance Class Action Settlement