Product Liability

Taste of the Wild Grain-Free Dog Food Heart Disease Lawsuit

Taste of the Wild Grain-Free Dog Food Heart Disease Lawsuit — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Case Overview

Two New York pet owners initiated this class action lawsuit against Schell & Kampeter Inc., which operates as Diamond Pet Foods and markets Taste of the Wild. The plaintiffs contend that the company falsely promotes its grain-free dog food as a beneficial and safe option for pets.

The core allegations are that the dog food increases the risk of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), a serious heart ailment in dogs. The plaintiffs argue that the companies violated New York's consumer protection laws by allegedly ignoring scientific studies, warnings from veterinarians, and even the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) investigation into the link between grain-free diets and DCM, while also fraudulently concealing this information.

The lawsuit seeks a jury trial and demands various forms of damages for all class members who purchased the food in the last three years. The content does not specify a current claims deadline or settlement terms, advising interested parties to consult with an attorney.

Who May Qualify

New York consumers who purchased Taste of the Wild grain-free dog food within the past three years.

Frequently Asked Questions

What specific health risk is alleged regarding the dog food?

The plaintiffs allege that the Taste of the Wild grain-free dog food increases the risk of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), which is described as a potentially fatal heart disease in dogs.

What laws do the plaintiffs claim were violated?

The lawsuit claims violations of New York's consumer protection laws and alleges that the manufacturer misrepresented and concealed information about its products, constituting unjust enrichment and violating New York General Business Law.

Related Cases

Baby Brezza Formula Maker Misrepresentation Lawsuit — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Baby Brezza Formula Maker Misrepresentation Lawsuit

Current
Product Liability
Parents filed a class action lawsuit alleging that Baby Brezza and The Betesh Group falsely advertised their Formula Maker machine as accurately dispensing baby formula. The plaintiffs claim the device dispensed insufficient amounts of formula powder, potentially harming infants.
QDOBA Class Action Over Salmonella-Contaminated Jalapeños — Product Liability class action lawsuit

QDOBA Class Action Over Salmonella-Contaminated Jalapeños

Current
Product Liability
A class action lawsuit was filed against QDOBA and its suppliers, alleging that jalapeños served at the fast-casual chain were contaminated with Salmonella, leading to a multi-state outbreak.
Iraq War Lawsuit for Injuries Sustained in Iraq or Afghanistan — Product Liability class action lawsuit

Iraq War Lawsuit for Injuries Sustained in Iraq or Afghanistan

Current
Product Liability
This legal action involves claims filed against the government of Iran, alleging that Iran supported terrorist groups responsible for attacks on American service members and contractors in Iraq and Afghanistan. The lawsuits aim to hold Iran financially accountable for the injuries and harm caused by these attacks.